@Leon Said
Nope. Which is why she addressed it.
In case you missed it:
‘“That's what happens when you improvise speeches in a second language. But of course I apologise if anyone misunderstood this,’ Thunberg wrote on Twitter on Saturday.
“The expression “putting someone against the wall” in Swedish describes a situation when someone is forced to address difficult questions or a difficult situation.
“But some right-wing voices on social media interpreted her comment as a call for violence against politicians.”
- source
Now, you can do one of two things here Bob. You can either accept this perfectly understandable explanation, or you can join the ranks of the twitchy, hypersensitive, bellyaching, politically correct, faultfinders that treat outrage like candy over every little thing anyone says, even when faced with as obvious misinterpretation as this one. (You know.... the very types of people you yourself despise.
)
Or I can do the obvious, and say Greta is a manipulated child who, as usual, had no real idea what she was talking about or saying.
This is not meant to be rude, but anyone who thinks the climate changing is a bad thing should be disqualified from voting. Are we in an ice age now? Have we been in more than one ice age before? Does being in an ice age, then not being in an ice age, then being in an ice age, then not being in an ice age, tell us something about the climate? If yes, what?
A four year old could answer those simple questions, yet, poor manipulated, ignorant Greta and her blinded devotees can't because 1+1 is a bridge too far for them.
She should be removed from her manipulative parents and given to a family that will care for her - not paraded around like some talking monkey and given tokenistic, meaningless trophies because it suits the purposes of a corrupt, vile elite that hid Epstein, rides around on private jets, manipulates children and runs media and social media to manipulate the gullible into not thinking for themselves.