I'm happy to hear that the remedies helped your family.
And yes, some things do help. Native honey helps pollen allergies by introducing a small amount of the pollen to the body, giving you a chance to develop "immunity" to it.
What I object to is the natural remedies that claim to "cure" more serious ailments. People relying on these over medical remedies are putting themselves at risk. I had a customer want that wanted me to "prescribe" (her words, not mine) a remedy for cancer. My company had a more ethical stand point than many, and I was required to advise her to seek medical attention (as I would have anyway), but many would happily send you away with lycopene supplements. Lycopene, found in tomatoes is "thought to" reduce the risk of cancer.
The thing to realise is that the sellers of herbal remedies are running a business, just like the drug companies. The difference is that the herbal industry is not regulated in the same way as the drug companies. This is why chemical drugs are more expensive. I believe (and anyone can jump in if I get my figures wrong) drugs companies have exclusivity on a drug for only 7 years. Of that, up to 5 years can be spent testing and satisfying the regulatory agencies. Meaning the companies have 2 years to recoup their investment.
In contrast, herbal remedies are regulated as food. No where near as strict, since side effects and long term effects need not be studied. And anyone that claims that herbals do not have side effects or contra-indications is talking from their backside. Take garlic when you have low blood pressure, and you're on the road to haemophilia. Or even garlic plus an aspirin a day. Take St. Johns Wort at the same time as any drug that acts on your central nervous system and it could have disasterous consequences.
Anyone looking at taking the herbal route to health should treat the remedies with as much caution as any doctor prescribed drug. More so, in fact, since you don't have the weight of a government regulatory agency behind you.