@jonnythan Said He and I had a bit of a go about physics a week or two ago.
He has some harebrained theories about physics, even though he has never studied it and doesn't understand the most basic concepts about force, mass, and gravity. For instance, he claims that space itself "pushes" on objects and what we call "gravity" is really just the fact that a mass such as a planet "shields" an object from some of the "pushing" force on one side causing it to fall towards the object. He also thought that an object thrown in space will move in one direction at a constant speed forever until it hits something.
He seems unwilling to actually study any physics whatsoever, preferring instead to "think outside the box." The box, in this case, seems to be "all of the data ever collected about mass and motion."
And still my question goes unanswered. There is no actual evidence to support gravitational
pull.
While I did say that an object in space would travel at the same velocity until it hit another object, I never said that gravity didn't affect it's trajectory/speed. I was just trying to explain myself in a hypothetical, which isn't legal here.
Either way, I'm trying to learn. That's why I asked the question. I'm not going to ask for a crash course in physics on a forum, it's far easier to take a class and learn first hand.
--
Still, I ask. How do we know there is a pull?
Throwing a brick out of a window does not prove there to be a pull, it just shows that there is a force acting upon all objects.
--
Also, as a side question I'd like to ask:
When two objects exert force upon each other, such as the case with a 180 lbs. man and the earth, they both "pull" on each other equally, yes?
These forces are viewed as "pull" but could they not just as easily be pushes?