I absolute despise him, i depise anyone who uses only some facts too influence people in there decisions while not giving both sides of a story. I decided to watch Sicko after my friend, who worships it, told me that we would be lucky to live in Cuba because they have it so much better than New Jersey. When I watched it I immediately hated his voice because it was condoning and just plain annoying. As I watched I began to notice that the insurance companies he talked about were smaller, lesser known companies. I also noticed that he only gave the democratic perspective and twisted things for his own gain. For example there was this little girl who was 'denied the right to hear from the mean, heartless insurance company' and of course Michael Moore was on the case, and though he explained the situation of how they were only paying for one of the ears, he left out that it was experimental and the insurance company didnt want to pay for both if they did not work, and if it did in the one they would have done the other too. When he took those 9/11 survivors to Guatonemo Bay he looked like a total douche, after all if your in a raft screaming to a facility that holds terriosts and criminals you bet your a** they are gonna sound the alarm. Overall hes a player, he does in fact give you the truth, but not the whole truth, if you want real opinions about the subjects you ask different people not just a man with a means to make a documentary.
Jun 14, 2009 @ 06:06:52
