@LuckyCharms Said
Well when you are replying to something said to me it is not surprising that I think your words are also directed toward me.
Not everyone - not even most, as far as I've heard - say it's race based to argue with his policies. But that's really neither here nor there.
Right now I'm talking about this, oh let's reuse the name for what Palin detractors were called, "Obama derangement syndrome" where everything negative about the man is swallowed and parroted - without any real questioning.
If I actually saw the questions, asking if what was said was true, I'd think differently. Instead it's a big hate fest.
No one or no thing is entirely good or entirely evil. But you'd be hard pressed to convince me of that from what I read here. That is if I didn't think critically about it.
I thought about going back over the past 5 years and hunting up a few examples of the accusations of 'racist' when someone tried questioning something Obama had said or done , when what was being questioned was totally unrelated to anything about race. but with my slow computer it would sometime early next week that I would be replying .
I have said many times IMO he is no better or no worse then a lot of politicians when it comes to politicians and their B.S. smack talk while they are asking voters for support.
As to my 'replying' to something said to you ,, all this time I been thinking that it was when a person is directly quoted in a post ,that meant it was about them.
I have never seen anything in your posts that would lead me to think of you as one of those Obama supporters that hasn't seen 'daylight in 5 or so years.' so it came as a surprise to read that you seem think my post was directed towards you personally. The was not my intention, my apologies for any offense or insult.