Does anyone feel sorry for/care about Sarah Ferguson?

@DorkySupergirl Said

That makes sense then. Canada's PM was invited but then again, Queen is head of our parliament.

Do you think Kanye would have stood up and said, "this is a really great wedding but..."

@someone_else Said

That's what I was thinking...

"This is a great wedding and I'mna let ya finish but..."
Poor Kanye West is never going to live that down.

@DorkySupergirl Said

Because William and Kate don't care about black people.

@DorkySupergirl Said

It was my thought that she was only related by marriage, a marriage that does not exist anymore. So why invite her? Her daughters are related to Prince William, not her in any legal way, shape or form.

@Jennifer1984 Said

Hmmmmm.... your comment above seems to suggest that her daughters aren't legally related to her. Now, I'm no lawyer and I'm not a fan of Sarah Ferguson but I do know that, as the birth mother, under British law she is legally the.....er..... mother.

We've got this wierd Brit thing over here where, when a child gestates inside a woman and is born of her she has a pretty solid legal foundation for telling the world "I am that child's mother".

It says so on the birth certificate.

Sarah Ferguson was not as big a mistake for the royal family as Diana. SF was easily paid off when the magnitude of her crassness, stupidity and penchant for tasteless behaviour and freeloading became apparent. Unlike the twisted, warped and vengeance-consumed Diana, Sarah Ferguson was easily booted into touch.

But she has a living to earn and expensive tastes to cater for, so if Oprah wants to stump up whatever it costs for her to appear on the show, and if an audience wants to listen to it, then you get what you pay for.

The only thing I would ask is.... please.... please... I beseech you.... Keep her over there..!!

.

@Jennifer1984 Said

Hmmmmm.... your comment above seems to suggest that her daughters aren't legally related to her. Now, I'm no lawyer and I'm not a fan of Sarah Ferguson but I do know that, as the birth mother, under British law she is legally the.....er..... mother.

We've got this wierd Brit thing over here where, when a child gestates inside a woman and is born of her she has a pretty solid legal foundation for telling the world "I am that child's mother".

It says so on the birth certificate.



.

@Jennifer1984 Said

Hmmmmm.... your comment above seems to suggest that her daughters aren't legally related to her. Now, I'm no lawyer and I'm not a fan of Sarah Ferguson but I do know that, as the birth mother, under British law she is legally the.....er..... mother.

We've got this wierd Brit thing over here where, when a child gestates inside a woman and is born of her she has a pretty solid legal foundation for telling the world "I am that child's mother".

It says so on the birth certificate.

Sarah Ferguson was not as big a mistake for the royal family as Diana. SF was easily paid off when the magnitude of her crassness, stupidity and penchant for tasteless behaviour and freeloading became apparent. Unlike the twisted, warped and vengeance-consumed Diana, Sarah Ferguson was easily booted into touch.

But she has a living to earn and expensive tastes to cater for, so if Oprah wants to stump up whatever it costs for her to appear on the show, and if an audience wants to listen to it, then you get what you pay for.

The only thing I would ask is.... please.... please... I beseech you.... Keep her over there..!!

.

@Jennifer1984 Said

Hmmmmm.... your comment above seems to suggest that her daughters aren't legally related to her. Now, I'm no lawyer and I'm not a fan of Sarah Ferguson but I do know that, as the birth mother, under British law she is legally the.....er..... mother.

We've got this wierd Brit thing over here where, when a child gestates inside a woman and is born of her she has a pretty solid legal foundation for telling the world "I am that child's mother".

It says so on the birth certificate.


.

@Room Said

no offense to my British mates but I dont "get" the whole royality thing.
Using all of that taxpayer money to kkep them living like millionaires.
Every country has it traditions so............

@Room Said

no offense to my British mates but I dont "get" the whole royality thing.
Using all of that taxpayer money to kkep them living like millionaires.
Every country has it traditions so............

@Floxy Said

Well, I pay 40% of my income in tax and don't mind a proportion of it going towards Her Majesty, the greatest living Monarch in history. It's my taxes paying the persistantly unemployed that gets me angry, but I won't go there.

You have Obama and his watermelon-ass wife, whereas we Brits - me speaking personally, mind - have a Queen. And Sarah Ferguson is a good laugh at dull parties.

@ninozara Said

The Crown Estates gave roughly £240 Million to the Treasury last year, and the Queen received about £40 million back through the Civil List.

Basically the Queen's estates and lands and business made the government £200 Million! That doesn't include all the money made by tourism or the business they drum up for other businesses...but people forget all that