Dems support the flea party

Never before has a boisterous campaign of civil disobedience – marked by more than 700 arrests – received the kind of warm welcome from a sitting president and his party that President Obama and leading Democrats have accorded the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.



Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/12/obamas-embrace-wall-street-protests-poses-political-peril/#ixzz1afYm3Was

This is interesting:



I just saw Bloomberg on the news this morning saying that they weren't doing anything illegal.


What I find laughable about this whole thing is that these protesters are causing the NYPD (and presumably every other 'occupied' city) to work overtime to the tune of something like $708,000. I forget if that's per week or per day.


Here in Seattle, the protesters are camping in the park where it is illegal to have a tent. Mayor McGinn has invited them to come to protest at City Hall where it would be legal for them - he is in 100% support of the protest - and they refuse.

Big difference in the medias mind however. The Tea Baggers were seen as patriots and have backing from authorities.
The OWS group (TRUE grass roots citizens) have been unfairly promoted as smelly, hippy, mis-contents.
Sad really.

Sure they are


https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013



Yep it's the spooky dude

Soros should be branded what he is. An international criminal.

700 people arrested for daring to walk in the street.

How dare they! Oh the horror!!

Great stimulus program. Imagine all the stuff they'll buy with their overtime.



What part of the constitution allows the government to ban tents?

Darn you Tino! I meant it is illegal to pitch a tent and camp in it.

And later they say it was not Soros but Ad-busters.

Proof or are you STILL just on with the diarrhea of the mouth?

What part of the constitution says the government can interfere with a peaceful assembly just because it happens to involve camping?

I think what she's saying is that they are camping in tents in a public park where there is already an ordinance against tents.

So what part of the constitution allows them to ban tents?

How about if they bring guns and hold shooting matches? Guns are in the constitution too.