The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Science

The Truth About The Space Race

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Carnotaurus On September 27, 2012




A City, Canada
#1New Post! Mar 09, 2012 @ 22:06:01
I have spoken to some conservatives in the past who say "America got to the moon before Soviet Russia, therefore capitalism is better than socialism." Actually America sent people to the moon through NASA and NASA is a taxpayer-funded government organization, therefore the space race was between government intervention and government intervention.

I don't think we should ever go to Mars because that would be a waste of money but if we do go to Mars then we'll need government intervention.
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#2New Post! Apr 29, 2012 @ 16:07:26
**removed from quarantine**
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#3New Post! Apr 29, 2012 @ 16:31:47
I watched total recall the other night. It would be cool if aliens did work out how to make an atmosphere we could live in on Mars. Like Earth but bigger.
townie_guy On May 07, 2013

Deleted



, United Kingdom
#4New Post! Apr 29, 2012 @ 16:45:32
Sooner or later we are gunna run out of space and resources on this planet. So we either move and and find away to live below the sea. Or we get into space.
Leon On March 30, 2024




San Diego, California
#5New Post! Apr 29, 2012 @ 17:10:55
@Carnotaurus Said

I have spoken to some conservatives in the past who say "America got to the moon before Soviet Russia, therefore capitalism is better than socialism." Actually America sent people to the moon through NASA and NASA is a taxpayer-funded government organization, therefore the space race was between government intervention and government intervention.

I don't think we should ever go to Mars because that would be a waste of money but if we do go to Mars then we'll need government intervention.


NASA is funded through taxation of a capitalist economy and, in return, that money is used to utilize private companies like General Dynamics in building their technologies. So capitalism still had its hand in sending people to the moon.

Soviet Russia, in contrast, bankrupted their base via forced collectivization in getting the money for their space program. It couldn't last. And didn't.
fractal7221 On November 08, 2012




Hubbard, Ohio
#6New Post! Apr 30, 2012 @ 22:07:37
Life continues to reproduce and adapt to survive. Our solar system will not last forever. At some point we will need to leave this solar system if we wish to survive. This will be an incredible daunting task that will require continually pushing the boundaries of our technology.

A manned mission to Mars is the next baby step in a long journey if we intend on continuing our existence beyond the lifespan of the Sun.
CamomileLawn On May 02, 2012

Banned



Goff\\\'s Oak, United Kingdom
#7New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 18:09:35
@treebee Said

I watched total recall the other night. It would be cool if aliens did work out how to make an atmosphere we could live in on Mars. Like Earth but bigger.


Mars is nearly half the size of Earth, lol.
ssnot_me On February 01, 2016




big D, Texas
#8New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 18:38:25
@Carnotaurus Said

I have spoken to some conservatives in the past who say "America got to the moon before Soviet Russia, therefore capitalism is better than socialism." Actually America sent people to the moon through NASA and NASA is a taxpayer-funded government organization, therefore the space race was between government intervention and government intervention.

I don't think we should ever go to Mars because that would be a waste of money but if we do go to Mars then we'll need government intervention.



If we should go anywhere, I think Europa would be the best place to visit.
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#9New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 19:24:12
@CamomileLawn Said

Mars is nearly half the size of Earth, lol.



everything is smaller nowadays!
CamomileLawn On May 02, 2012

Banned



Goff\\\'s Oak, United Kingdom
#10New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 19:25:59
@treebee Said

everything is smaller nowadays!


That's what men tell us, anyway.
drman321 On December 28, 2013




, Florida
#11New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 19:31:12
@ssnot_me Said

If we should go anywhere, I think Europa would be the best place to visit.



yeah blisteringly cold and inhospitable to life as we know it. That sounds like just the ticket.
ssnot_me On February 01, 2016




big D, Texas
#12New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 19:35:33
@drman321 Said

yeah blisteringly cold and inhospitable to life as we know it. That sounds like just the ticket.



well.... there seems to be evidence that Europa might have a liquid ocean under all that ice. and the chances that there is life there is greater than any other place in our solar system. and yeah it might not be life as we know it.
drman321 On December 28, 2013




, Florida
#13New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 19:57:58
@ssnot_me Said

well.... there seems to be evidence that Europa might have a liquid ocean under all that ice. and the chances that there is life there is greater than any other place in our solar system. and yeah it might not be life as we know it.



A liquid ocean is not all we need for life. A liquid ocean under a massive planet-wide sheet of ice can easily be considered "inhospitable to life" when we are discussing the possibilities for human life on that moon.

As far as the chances being greater there than anywhere else in the universe, that is like saying Mitt Romney has the greatest chance of not being a lunatic out of all the Republican candidates. It doesn't mean he is not crazy, it just means he is the only one we have any hope of seeing even a glimmer of "normal" out of.

Europa is not terribly hospitable to life, but compared to the other contenders in our solar system it does have some of the highest chances.
ssnot_me On February 01, 2016




big D, Texas
#14New Post! May 02, 2012 @ 20:01:58
@drman321 Said

A liquid ocean is not all we need for life. A liquid ocean under a massive planet-wide sheet of ice can easily be considered "inhospitable to life" when we are discussing the possibilities for human life on that moon.

As far as the chances being greater there than anywhere else in the universe, that is like saying Mitt Romney has the greatest chance of not being a lunatic out of all the Republican candidates. It doesn't mean he is not crazy, it just means he is the only one we have any hope of seeing even a glimmer of "normal" out of.

Europa is not terribly hospitable to life, but compared to the other contenders in our solar system it does have some of the highest chances.


okay, well i am not really sure, but i think you did agree with me.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Be Respectful of Others

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Wed Jul 27, 2011 @ 23:14
0 896
New posts   Random
Fri Jul 02, 2010 @ 18:04
11 808
New posts   Politics
Sat Nov 05, 2011 @ 03:02
47 2316
New posts   Pics & Videos
Thu Nov 05, 2009 @ 17:16
1 458
New posts   Science
Fri Sep 07, 2007 @ 22:49
1 659