@Coleosis Said 
Well, when a country is so far in debt, it would help to not give a guy healthcare and food and a place to stay for 15-20yrs that was on camera executing someone and then dragging their dead body around. He's been condemed, you have the murder weapon, a confession, and a video of them doing it/or they still have the body with them...They dont deserve to get the chance to appeal it 50 times.
scenario: Guy was stopped at a roadblock, the cop noticed blood dripping from the trunk area. Found someone you love's mutilated corpse in there, the murder weapon in/under the front seat. Then that person confesses, and is later sentenced to death. Do you think he should be kept alive for 15-20yrs before being executed?
But a death penalty is a death penalty...Why pay to keep someone alive for 15yrs if they are going to, in the end, die by your hands?
You want to hear something that's just....wrong?
I went and looked after I made a comment about leaving the person in prison for 15-20 years being a drain on the tax payers. I even quoted a figure for how long it takes to incarcerate a person for 15 years (average). Then, after I posted that, I went to compare that cost to the cost of execution. It costs
more (by a lot) to execute than it does to incarcerate for life!
Why?
Oct 30, 2010 @ 08:05:51
