White House in Tumult

That is correct. I am not a Libertarian either. I don't call myself ANY party. That's what independents are. They don't support any platform to a degree that they support the bulk of it and can therefore be safely called a member.

You could say one has similar views on a given particular issue as a particular party does, but that is different.

As it stands right now, Obama just needs Ohio, OR Virginia, OR Florida and Wisconsin in order to win.

Romney would have to win Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and Wisconsin to win.

Since Romney has almost no chance in Wisconsin, and very little chance in Ohio, I'd say it's a done deal.

If it is then so are we.

Romney definitely needs Florida, but he can lose one of the other three states as long as he takes the other two.

You're not going to be able to take the polls seriously until they've finished their triangulation to sync the polls with reality that they start about a month out from the election--and that won't be done until just before election day. I mean they've been weighting the damn things up to 10 points for Democrats.

It's done for intimidation and influence purposes, and this time as so often in the past, they'll come done to reality in time.

What polls have done this, specifically? Can you link to the methodology? Most polling agencies publish their raw data and methodology.

I could dig it up (or you could ), but I'm blue in the face already. So I suggest that you just note the polls at the election and remember where they were 2 months ago--and then remember all that at the next election.

There's no doubt that our polling science has gotten very sophisticated, but so has the ability to skew them.

Polling cannot account for turnout.

Can I just say that this is my absolute favorite signature of all.. More proof that conservatives don't understand graphs and charts.

Must be all that good home schoolin' that yall got comin' up.

"Likely Voters" is supposed to be a gauge for enthusiasm. If it isn't then throw out the polls, which is great with me since they're skewed by the lib media anyway.




No idea what you're talking about. Please explain or (preferably) go back to sleep. (I hope you're not talking about the gauge not being to scale for 87%. If so, you need to check into an old folks home with terminal pettymind.....if you haven't been committed there already.)

Why don't you look at what WAS said & the timeline?
https://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/15/1014241/timline-benghazi-attack/

You & Romney = shoot first then aim.