@ThunderingEcho Said
The parts become a whole and then the sum of the parts become more...I think that is truth for most people. For instance, within a cell (a whole) how does ribosomes communicatr their needs for amino acids when building a protein...How about those signal recognition particles that direct the traffic. Thereby the whole is more then its parts, so it seems.
As for refuting evolutionary theroy with this "universe adaptive mechanism" idea?...I was not negating evolution I was impleing that the universe was alive and well due to it design mechanism defined as evolution.
As for energy and bonding... another thought could be as the energy/thought goes down the axon and jump across the synapse, thought is not tranmitted till bonding of energy has occured...is energy thought...is thought matter.. is the universe alive.
Then of course if the universe does have said mechanism.. then of course if one is the drone of breeding then one is doom to be the drone of breeding as it is by design.
As for as the topic...what I had for responses has been the cult of women and how much energy is needed for birth and there is evidences of that truth...The hard leg saying yes yes yes yes I love breeding, so it seems. And a young women who was focusing on the "now" as purpose of life.
Then there was one man that was actually reflective who I answered equally reflective.
Ok, I think I'm following you now. Your ideas follow the same line of reasoning as Kants Trancendental Idealism. Where the mind of the knower makes an active contribution of the experience of objects before us.
The problem with this way of thinking is, there is very little to any proof to it. When I say proof I am meaning the measure of consistant reactions to a object or given circumstance.
Sure the synapss in our minds is a form of electricity, and the universes electricity is all around us. Electricity is just a means to a end, our bodies have created a way to harness its power in a biological cell. To think that the loose energy flowing thoughout the cosmos has controled potential is just theory.
Look at it like this. Take a beach full of sand if you could "control" each individual sand you could make a mountian. A mountian boken down is just controled sand. Our biological mind is just a means of controling smaller forms of electricity, and a lighting bolt is just uncontroled sand. Our minds just like the mountian control this small form of loose electricity and direct it to a larger goal/form.
I think (agian I am frequently wrong) you are saying that the universe has a goal or a balance it is trying to achieve. I don't think you have much proof to this idea, just like I don't have much proof to the contrary. Neither side is right or wrong but remember to prove a theory is valid you must be able to compare and test it vs what is already known.