@4000earthquakes Said Why are people who simply do not trust the government or other big organizations at their word, and seek to understand things beyond what the "experts" are telling them called "conspiracy idiots"?
The so called "experts" typicaly earn thier positions from years of study and aplication of studied subjects.
True.
@4000earthquakes Said Religion is a
conspiracy to rope innocent people into their fold, in order to take their money, sway their votes, and keep them under their thumb.
Off topic, but also true.
@4000earthquakes Said
Those moon-landing pictures looked mighty faked to me. Heck the horizon, or "curve of the moon" was like, only a half mile in the background. How come we never saw beyond those very close back-ground hills?
The moon is only a fraction of the size of the earth, because of the earths size its only possible to see 30 miles in any direction at ground level. The moon being a smaller body would less of a distance.
@4000earthquakes Said
Why didn't they go to the top of those hills and take some pictures for us -- of a larger landscape?
Mountain climbing is dangerous on earth. Can you imagine what it would be like in a 75lb suit, in low gravity in a foren eviorment? Sorry hill/mountian climbing was not advisable.
Lighting in atmosphere of earth is much diffrent than a area without atmosphere. A good amount of the camera equipment they brought with them was not only disigned for a huge amount of glare but was also disigned to survive the trip and be functional vs quality.
@4000earthquakes Said
How come they never attempted to bounce a basket ball, so people could see what that would be like in a minimal gravity environment?
A basketball contains air under presure to retain its shape. If you put a presurised ball on a space craft entering a place with no atmosphere you have no presure at that point on the outside of the ball, effectivly turning it into a little round bomb. The second they bumped it into a sharp object or bounced it on a sharp rocky eviorment, it would explode, sending peices of astronaught into space.
@4000earthquakes Said
Why didn't they try to do some juggling, to show people what would happen to those balls in a low-gravity environment?
Juggling as we know it is impossible in a low gravity eviroment. As much fun as it is to throw things around all that expencive equipment I think they wanted to pass.
@4000earthquakes Said You know, just a couple of cute, human interest things, so people could at least get their moneys worth for all the tax money they invested for that venture.
Limited time on the first landing . Wasn't it Apollo 13 that was comming to run more experements on the moon? That was the one that had the terrible accident.
@4000earthquakes Said
Why weren't there any burn marks on the ground under the space craft where it had landed?
They did't use fire as a propelent. Fire doesn't work without atmosphere. No fire, no burn marks.
@4000earthquakes Said
Another thing I've wondered about; (This is more of a science question):
How does the moon have
any gravity?
Isn't "rotation" the prime cause for gravity?
If the earth stopped rotating, we'd all float off into space, right?
How does the moon have gravity, if it, by itself, does not rotate?
It merely rotates around the earth.
Ok, talk.
The moon is trapped in the gravitational pull of the earths rotation.
As one body rotates around another body, a gravity like force happens. I think its called "cintrifical force" (exuse the spelling). Grab hold of your friends hands and both of your spin around while holding each others hands, you can recreate a gravity like effect. This is the gravity that is felt on on the moon. You can also see the pull that the moon has on the earth, in the form of "Tides".
Sources:
https://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/earth/moons_and_rings.html
https://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=142