@gingernproud Said
Yes your right it would be,i just don't see no point in giving a mass murderer the opportunity to re offend and believe the death penalty in these cases guarantees they wont and cant.
to me its the protection of others rather than punishment of the murderer.
i don't believe mass murderers can be rehabilitated as from what ive read even if there is no sexual contact ,a mass murderer kills for the sexual high and sexual preferences cant be changed.id also give the same sentence to d.n.a proved repeated child sex offenders also,if it was upto me.
@LuckyCharms Said
Well, there are certain cases where I'd like to see the death penalty used. Serial murderers, serial rapists and pedophiles (that have acted on those impulses). Problem is that it's so damned expensive. It's actually cheaper to pay for those SOB's to be in jail for their entire lifetime than it is to carry out the death penalty on them. But in my opinion, those groups have lost the right to process oxygen. As much as I hate to say it, the wild west had it right when they'd just take them out back and give them some ventilation.
I realize it's not a very civilized position, however it would prevent them from ever creating any more victims or ruining any more lives.
If these guys were made to serve their entire lives in prison, I'd be happy with no death penalty. Prison overcrowding is what's always kept me on the fence. I haven't voted yet, but seeing at least 3 cases of innocent men being punished with life sentences (and the way it affected their lives) on TV in the last week has sickened me.