Hilary Rodham Clinton connected to a child abductor?

@chaski Said

No she didn't. He was convicted and went to jail.

Actually, based on the poor evidence system of the police and the pathetic prosecution, she (as an attorney) should have fought harder and got her client off... completely.

However, she actually didn't live up to her oath as a lawyer and talked her client into pleading guilty...knowing full well that she could easily have gotten him off completely.

@mrmhead Said

Well, if she had gotten him off, she would be just as bad as Bill.

@mrmhead Said

Well, if she had gotten him off, she would be just as bad as Bill.

@shinobinoz Said

Bill was the one that "got off"

@nooneinparticular Said

Okay, is it suddenly morally and legally acceptable to go and hack companies for information because I believe them to be motivated by greed and a thirst for power? Is it suddenly morally and legally acceptable to cyber stalk CEO's, district managers, and store managers because 'power craves more power'? Is it suddenly acceptable to data-mine people in a corporations chain of command because I have a problem with the system?

That's my biggest problem with this whole argument. We're talking about PEOPLE. Not simple, caricatured, little hell spawns, but PEOPLE.

@nooneinparticular Said

Like I said before, you don't get a new system simply by wishing for it really hard. You don't suddenly get a new world that caters to your interests simply because of the idea of the inevitability of divine intervention.

@chaski Said

No she didn't. He was convicted and went to jail.

Actually, based on the poor evidence system of the police and the pathetic prosecution, she (as an attorney) should have fought harder and got her client off... completely.

However, she actually didn't live up to her oath as a lawyer and talked her client into pleading guilty...knowing full well that she could easily have gotten him off completely.

@chaski Said

I think it comical.

Our country's legal system is founded on the ideas of "innocent until proven guilty", legally obtained evidence, the right to confront one's accuser and everyone has a right to legal counsel.

In addition, if one is a practicing trial attorney one might be selected by a judge to act as defense counsel, even if one doesn't like it.

However, if a lawyer does his/her job in defending a suspected criminal, that lawyer is a horrible crime supporting creep.

And, if a lawyer talks his/her client into pleading guilty, said lawyer is guilty of getting the client off...even though the client went to jail.



But hey...we are living in an era of alternative facts.

@SgtPowerPickle Said

haha please. He got off compared to what a rapist should get. Yet you're defending a slap on the wrist for raping a young girl. Wow.

Now look at you poorly trying to twist her s*** into cupcakes. You can go ahead and eat those cupcakes up buddy, I'll pass on the s***. I heard the audio.

@SgtPowerPickle Said

6 months is fair for a the trauma that usually lasts a lifetime. For you to even think thats admirable says a lot

@SgtPowerPickle Said

6 months is fair for a the trauma that usually lasts a lifetime. For you to even think thats admirable says a lot

@SgtPowerPickle Said

"The aim of argument, or discussion, should not be victory, but progress." -Ole Joey Joubert
Ideas can become progress the more they're discussed. So why not?

@SgtPowerPickle Said

haha please. He got off compared to what a rapist should get. Yet you're defending a slap on the wrist for raping a young girl. Wow.

Now look at you poorly trying to twist her s*** into cupcakes. You can go ahead and eat those cupcakes up buddy, I'll pass on the s***. I heard the audio.

@SgtPowerPickle Said

6 months is fair for a the trauma that usually lasts a lifetime. For you to even think thats admirable says a lot