Seriously...nipples

...no it hasn't.
present some evidence for that please.

Before we are even born we lose 50% of our brain cell due to oxygen deprivation. 4000 bc when the earth was created it had a hydrogen canopy. 3000 bc during the flood that canopy was distroyed. now the canopy held the earths atmosphere in closer to the earths surface. meaning that before we lost the canopy there would have been little to none brain loss

!!!
ok the flood is bloody ridiculous, but i can see right now you're beyond hope, good luck dude.

I never really thought about it. They don't do anything for me; I don't do anything for them. We get along well enough.

At least I was able to provide reasoning evidence for my explination. You could only tell me to watch a video on youtube. Can you even explain for yourself the reasoning behind your belief? Do you even have any college degrees under your belt?

yeah, you keep telling yourself that you're smarter than 99% of biologists and psysicts ...i guess their degrees don't mean squat. :p:


And that video contained valuable information, ignore it if you wish.

and yes i can explain my reasoning, i have an abundance of genetic and physical evidence to support my beliefs, it's as simple as that.
Its an extrapolation based on evidence.

tell me this evidence and btw all the scientest i know do not beleave in evolution

what you know does not represent all the data

well i've already shown you transitional fossils and you havn't refuted them, lets take this one step at a time.

and what you know does?

It certainly doesn't,
That's why i have to remain open to the possibility that i am wrong, as we all should. Right now the evidence leading me to the conclusion that evolution is true is overwhelming, if this evidence is challenged i will not ignore it.

something like, a rabbit found in a Cambrian age strata, or humans and dinsaurs found hanging out together, or any piece of evidence that doesn't fit in with evolution.
.....but right now everything does, so if you're privy to information that dislodges it from the natural progression of logic let me know.