Quote:
The dead Iraquis had a chance with Saddam? Hmm...how about no?
Get real here. Your saying they would rather be dead than alive?
must be a right wing moral point. you know what I mean? Abortion is bad but its fine to kill some civilians on accident. Uh. conflict. hello?
Quote:
See, this is more of that topsy-turvey liberal brainwashing that you're a victim of.
perhaps i am brainwashed. I at least watch the news. maybe the republican party is slipping something into my milk. Dude I know your not name calling, but these words leave me wondering.
Quote:
Would they be better off under Saddam and his death camps? Maybe we should just let him go, apologize to everybody, and let him resume where he left off.
Ok i will answer this for you.
lets break this big "they" down. They is mothers, fathers,daughters, sons, etc. now Yes saddam was killing lots of folks in torture camps. All the olympic people. Etc.
The flaw in your argument is that your saying the current dead(only those that died as a consequence of the war)would eventually have been killed by saddam. I guess you must have some stats on the number he killed. Yes he called them rats. Kurds. Well take those numbers and compare them in a statistically equal time period. I.E. if americas solution has been in effect for the same amount of time as saddam then who would have the largest kill number. Of course your going to say that the flaw in my argument is that things will get better. They haven't yet and in fact continue to worsen. Remember there was no insurgency during his reign and kids got fed with out the fear of what occured this morning.(see above article)
Quote:
Would they be better off under Saddam and his death camps? Maybe we should just let him go, apologize to everybody, and let him resume where he left off.
I say yes. they had basic necessities and are human people. They would figure ways out to stay under the radar. I equate this to people who are starving in Sudan. Yes we are now working on this. thank god. However these people are in a simliar situation. they have no options. Now answer this. IF we went in there and removed their "structure" would it help or hurt? If our actions cause an insurgency, shouldn't we be prepared and ready to stop it. When do the childrens lives again become important. Because what is happening as a result of our actions is lots and lots of death.
Quote:
Maybe we should just let him go, apologize to everybody, and let him resume where he left off
That is a silly question. You know it is. What is done is done. You look back at the situation and you determine the cause of the decline. I am sure its not bushes fault. It probably is all Osama Bin Laden. Man it would have been nice to STAY ON TARGET. We may have had him.
Heres some questions for you.
Would you rather have Saddam or Osama?
Should we go in and "help" free Iran?
Would we be able to do it better now.
Do you really thing Saddam was or is a threat?
What about North Korea?
What about Suda?
What about China?
How does the recent events with Russia affect your opinion?
Did you know that our leadership has held high level talks with those chechen rebels?
Last Question: Would america still be okay if the war had never occured, would we be nuked yet or chemically destroyed?
check out this little story about the WOOL BEING PULLED OVER
https://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040930/pl_afp/us_iraq_allawi_letter&cid=1521&ncid=1480