Yes Jill there was voter fraud in Michigan

Quote:
Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.

Quote:
The problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn’t recount votes in 392 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. And two-thirds of those precincts had too many votes.

@DiscordTiger Said

Hmmm... I thought Jill was a crazy sell out to Soros? Just making s*** up and wasting Other people's money that could go to something useful.

@bobbimay Said


Hmmm maybe that is why the Judge in Pennsylvania wouldn't let the count go on...didn't want their voter fraud out in the open...

@chaski Said

And thus Trump should be supporting the recounts...maybe even demanding for them.

With the possible exception of the mathematically challenged, everyone, including both Jill and Hillary, know that the end result would remain the same; winner Trump.

In fact, I go so far as to say that Trump should be listening to the CIA and calling Russia out. It wouldn't hurt Trump and would actually serve to make him look more rational and more of a president for all of America.

Sure some extreme liberals would still complain (as did many conservatives over that last 8 years), but it would mostly shut them up.

@chaski Said

And thus Trump should be supporting the recounts...maybe even demanding for them.

With the possible exception of the mathematically challenged, everyone, including both Jill and Hillary, know that the end result would remain the same; winner Trump.

In fact, I go so far as to say that Trump should be listening to the CIA and calling Russia out. It wouldn't hurt Trump and would actually serve to make him look more rational and more of a president for all of America.

Sure some extreme liberals would still complain (as did many conservatives over that last 8 years), but it would mostly shut them up.

@bobbimay Said


As for Russia...where and how did Russia "steal" the election???

@twilitezone911 Said


Russia want the president, they are familiar with like Hillary.

@chaski Said

No. Russia wants weak president that can be manipulated and be very different from Obama.

Putin doesn't really get along with Obama. Obama views Russia as a regional power not a true world power to be contended with. With Obama Russia was criticized for invading the Ukraine and the USA & EU issued sanctions against Russia. In addition, the USA has criticized Russia regarding Syria..... etc

Hillary would have continued this perspective.

With Trump, Putin gets an ally that he thinks he can manipulate and Russia is treated with more "respect" and as a "world power". In addition, Putin thinks (or hopes) that the criticism and sanctions regarding the Ukraine will go away. Russia also becomes viewed as a power player in the middle east.

I could go on and on, but the reality is that for Putin and Russia Trump is and was viewed at the better choice.

@twilitezone911 Said

I thought that would be the case. I thought bozo would take the advantage of get better deal with Russia.

anything do with money and Russia, that bozo can get out Russia for his personal use and make his friends richer.

bozo want monopoly everything, he can get throughout the world. it would explain the odd cabinet choices of businessmen, he choices for his administration.

it doesn't seem of bozo's choices has any experience of the kind of new roles that they are going to play next year.

bozo want power to get money, than running America. that would make sense.

@nooneinparticular Said

I think it was fairly obvious that Trump saw very little, if any, difference between running a country and running a corporation. This dissonance was apparently an acceptable trade-off for the 'possibility of change' to a lot of the general voting populace.