@Eaglebauer Said 
Do you believe the designer is the one responsible for putting you in this life, or is it someone working with the designer? Or possibly against the designer?
I don't know.
There are various possibilities
1. Nefarious humans with advanced tech and knowledge meddling with creation.
2. Creation in progress.
3. Advanced doctors working with creation to aid with nuerological disorders.
4. A surrogate situation as recreation away from another, more definite, existence where in dichotomy and customizable personas are impossible.
@Eaglebauer Said
Incest is a sin? Well, sure it is, it makes for a higher incidence of birth defects and is bad for the propogation of the human race.
I think it shows a self-preservation built into the machinations of religion itself: that all serious thought was exepected in one way or another to serve religion. Too many questions that don't serve religion might end up creating opponents of religion, or more specifically, the idea of God.
Some Christian-Specific morals are obviously backed by common sense but those common sense issues have been placed under the safety of the God shroud so that people cannot challenge them in politics.
Some philosophers out there are still fundamentalists attempting to backhandedly sell Christianity.
In my instance I realize how a lot of the stuff I've come to understand is covered by fundamentalism but will also be the first to admit that I feel that Christian organizations are taking the common denominators that I've mentioned, painting uglier stories around them and packing them with their own sense of self-righteousness.
@Eaglebauer Said
So to you then, it boils down to a question of contrast either being a catalyst for growth or an inhibitor of progress?
If I were to write a large book of many chapters, that would only fill one.
Sep 16, 2012 @ 18:52:22
