What does the Republican Party stand for?

So Chaski, if you're so damn smart.

-name a nation that is socialist that has a good human rights record did not utilize Marxist purge of society ideas. Also, the nation has to be one that is not vulnerable to take over by a tyrannical regime.

You have discredited your own hypothesis and refuse to do the research.

Keep the laughs coming.

A dictatorship is a form of government. Socialism is a form of economics. The two are not mutually exclusive. If a dictator directly controls the economy and modes of production, what form of economics is in play?

I have not defended any nation that is socialist, so why would start defending one now?

I'll accept that. However, the list of Marxist nations that I presented is fairly comprehensive and they all used mass murder to purge their societies of dissenters.

Correct.



Partially correct. Socialism is a political, social and economic.




Correct, the two are not mutually exclusive... and the two are not necessarily found in the same governments/countries.



If a dictator took power and privatized banks, shipyards, railway lines, shipping lines, welfare organizations, etc... and took the stance that enterprises should be in private hands wherever possible... what form of economics is in play?

Not all the nations you put in your list were Marxist.

A dictatorship is a form of government. Socialism is a form of economics. The two are not mutually exclusive. If a dictator directly controls the economy and modes of production, what form of economics is in play?

Further, the economies of the Empires of Europe where capitalist in nature. This led to the rise of the middle class and the conversion of those nations into democracies. Some of those nations converted to Constitutional Monarchies. Other nations saw their royalty lose power completely.

Repeating yourself does not make you correct.

If a dictator took power and privatized banks, shipyards, railway lines, shipping lines, welfare organizations, etc... and took the stance that enterprises should be in private hands wherever possible... what form of economics is in play?

Incorrect. Socialism is not a political, social and economic system. It is simply a form of economics.

Marxist socialism is a political, social and economic system.

All of the nations in my list are Marxist because they where Socialist dictatorships.

Get a dictionary.

Wrong again... as I have explained numerous times.

Your statement are gettin dumber and dumber... have you been drinking?

A dictatorship is a form of government. Socialism is a form of economics. The two are not mutually exclusive. If a dictator directly controls the economy and modes of production, what form of economics is in play?

Further, the economies of the Empires of Europe where capitalist in nature. This led to the rise of the middle class and the conversion of those nations into democracies. Some of those nations converted to Constitutional Monarchies. Other nations saw their royalty lose power completely.

If a dictator took power and privatized industry he would be in the same position as the original Empires of Europe from above. It is logical to assume over time the middle class would rise and the dictatorship would end.

THAT is the whole point of Marxism if you see through the guile or not To recreate the Empires that existed before and put a minority back in power.