The Law is defined as that which is given to ensure the harmonious functioning of a given system.
The Law is comprised of that from which The Law emanates, that which administers The Law, the written form of The Law and the unwritten form of The Law.
That from which The Law emanates is the Supreme Ruler, whom is the Jurisdiction, the Jury and Final Adjudicator. God.
That which administers The Law is at one with the Supreme Ruler and is the One to whom judgement is entrusted.
The written form of The Law consists of regulations, guidelines and rules by which to live in order to ensure harmonious fuctioning of the system of which the Supreme Ruler is the Final Adjudicator.
The unwritten form of The Law is simply the underlying form of The Law, otherwise called the Spirit of The Law. It is that which both pervades and sustains The Law whilst also being that which is revealed when The Law is fulfilled.
Logic is on yor side. I will not refute it; but. then came man to interpret it! The result?---->
RULE OF LAW?
For years rumor has had it that this country is founded
on the "Rule of Law". But! Which LAW? The ACT of Congress?
The LAW as decided by a judge in a particular CASE? That
spelled out by the Constitution of the United States? Or any
one of these --- which ever is convenient for the parties at
One of the above is right. One of the above is wrong.
AND the other two must rely on the "Letter of the Law" as
stipulated by the written language of the CONSTITUTION. The
Rule of Law? You judge!
Article VI of the Constitution establishes the
supremacy of the Constitution over any and all ACTS of
Congress which are contrary to it. AND also to any CASE
decisions by the court which may also be construed to be so.
It must be understood that our Congress can never
anticipate and enact legislation to cover all acts of
aggression against the people as attitudes, science,
business, finance and politics change. To meet current
contingencies, the court established its own system of
JUSTICE so that conduct which violated the CONSTITUTIONAL
rights of the people could be addressed. AS Justice Marshall
said in Marbury vs Madison:
"That the people have an original right to establish,
for their future government, such principles as, in their
opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the
basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected.
The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion;
nor can it nor ought it to be frequently repeated."
So Congress abdicated its responsibility "To exercise
exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such
district --- as may, by cession of particular States, and
the acceptance of Congress, be the seat of government of the
United States, ---." in violation of the letter of the LAW.
Our tax legislation is loaded with ex post facto laws
and no one really cares.
Our laws governing banking and S&Ls abound with
regulations which are not based on any laws passed by
Congress. This should be covered by CASE law; but, I doubt that
anyone will act to sue the parties involved. This includes
the HUD scandal.
Our courts are bogged down by procedure and conflicting
legal opinions necessitating long delays and backup of court
cases. Only a piano tuner can correct the discord. And so few
judges can even carry a tune. I guess it is because we have
three tiers of justice and a judge may not know which cord to
How goes the watch by night?