The American Green Party may have the "Brave New World".

Personally I supported green issues as along as they had the confrontable geography based upon historical and natural historical conditions. Makes for a strange irreconcilable psychology; you cognitionists may say. For behaviourism there is no representation of the temporal passage for the individual life in the midst of social planning in such a geographical setting. Then the cognitional content has time for metaphysical consciousness justified internally in a way by evolution in that other groups mechanisms for action in empirical research.


But anyway I won't go into that. The future is the constant concern by the environmentalists, and for them the future is a strongly required proof of inexorably demanded exact actions (much like behaviourism would seek and r-observe in the midst of the entirely geographic and included in that, geological/biological environment. And besides that the cognitionists can do it too. We have freedom and it is politically ethical.


Once on the political and ethical we no longer are operative in the realms of geography and history for the progress. What progress when well it is to see that there is no longer any progress in anti-geograhical, basically globalized terms. GOOD; I'm all for this. It is against war, and at the same time against poverty being justified. But further now without progress the problem is how to work out the science (yes, progressive science) against non-valuable consumerism, both for and against greed.

Americans especially on the left are famous for not liking geography. This science is counterfactual and in dealing in such topics as climate change it applies the philosophical conscience of ethos of materialism. Now the cognitionists (Ralph Nader, and anthropological types more in the Canadian green party) have joined with the behaviourists (the matter is not genetic and hereditary, but environmental for necessities of the perception of that heredity subject).


THE BRAVE NEW WORLD is the world of the future controlled blindly upon the masses. How? That is by the very ignorance of the masses for the future, they have cleverly disguised in lies. Propaganda; is it to be questioned as Being true or Not; the truth on that substantial issue for the braveness of facing up to our responsibilities IS beyond knowledge, but persistently some kind of knowability we are deceived about when we are out of power.