The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Tax, Tax Shelters, Crimes, and Avoiding the Consequences......

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
justvr On February 20, 2006




, Wallis and Futuna
#1New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 08:58:00
So, lawyers and accountants, would you dob in your clients to avoid criminal penalties?

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/14/business/14shelter.html?
_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1139907090-Z1A3Lz5/t7PqgujCWC1YMg.
I.R.S. Offers Deal to Firms Promoting Tax Shelters

The Internal Revenue Service is making an unusual offer of leniency to firms that made and
sold questionable tax shelters: come forward, pay penalties and turn over information, and
you may avoid criminal prosecution.
The offer is being made to accounting firms, law firms, banks and investment firms that
have created and sold tax shelters that the I.R.S. considers bogus, as well as to firms that
carried out the financial transactions that underpin such shelters. Questionable shelters
have been sold to thousands of wealthy investors in recent years. Under the offer, the
firms must disclose the names of those investors.
Firms that do not come forward face larger fines and possible criminal prosecution,
according to a copy of the four-page offer now being mailed to firms. A spokesman for
the I.R.S. confirmed the contents of the letter.
The I.R.S. has extended similar offers to wealthy investors in recent years, but this is the
first of its kind to firms that promote tax shelters.
The offer has some carrots. The agency is offering to not disclose publicly the names of
firms that come forward or the terms of their settlements. It also offers to assess no
penalties against the firms for failing to provide information about investors earlier. (Firms
are already required to keep lists of investors in shelters that the I.R.S. considers abusive.)
Other penalties will still apply.
The I.R.S. expects to bring in several billion dollars through the offer once the program is
completed later this year, according to people briefed on the program.
Offers will be made to at least 66 tax shelter promoters and possibly more, but probably
not to all 118 firms now being actively audited by the I.R.S. for their work on aggressive
shelters, according to the people briefed on the program.
The I.R.S. began making its offers to promoters in late December, and has so far sent out
about 30 letters. It expects to extend remaining offers in coming months. The offers cover
questionable transactions sold before Oct. 22, 2004, and give firms 30 days to pay.
Under the offer, the I.R.S. reserves the right to refer to its own criminal division any
employees from firms that received amnesty whom it suspects of having broken the law.
More significantly, the agency reserves the right to refer firms and employees to the
Justice Department for criminal prosecution.
The offer comes at a time when the Justice Department has brought criminal charges
against 17 former professionals with the accounting firm KPMG, an outside lawyer and an
investment adviser. The 19 are accused of scheming to defraud the I.R.S. through the
creation and sale of four tax shelters. All are fighting the charges.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan have also been investigating the role of three lawyers in
questionable tax shelters.
Tax lawyers said yesterday that the I.R.S.'s offer would not affect the government's ability
to conduct criminal prosecutions in tax shelter cases.
Carolyn D. Ciraolo, a tax lawyer in Baltimore, said that any firms that cooperate with the
government are more likely to help the government build cases against another firm or
other employees.
It is unclear how popular the offer will be among promoters. "It is a bad deal," said one
lawyer who represents an accounting firm that has been sued by investors who bought its
shelters. He said that the I.R.S. wanted too much information under the offer, citing a
requirement that marketing materials and other documents must be turned over, leaving a
firm potentially exposed to further investigations and prosecutions.
Tax shelters typically require an accounting firm to design and sell the shelter, a law firm
to write legal opinions blessing the transactions and a bank or investment firm to carry out
the financial workings. Dozens of accounting, law and financial firms have been named in
civil complaints filed by former investors as promoters of questionable shelters. A 2003
report by a Senate subcommittee on aggressive tax shelters described the roles of
Deutsche Bank and the law firm Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, among others.
Until now, the I.R.S. has confronted promoters of abusive shelters by assessing penalties
for violating rules that required firms to register such shelters and to keep lists of
investors who buy them. Penalties are calculated either as 1 percent of the losses claimed
by a taxpayer, or as much as 50 percent of the profits earned by the promoter.
Current regulations on penalties for promoters allow the I.R.S. to collect from a single
promoter all of the penalties due on a single shelter transaction involving multiple
promoters.
But under the amnesty offer, the I.R.S. proposes to collect only a portion of each
promoter's penalty due on each shelter, calculated as a percentage reflecting the firm's
degree of participation in the transaction.
"We view this as a bit of an incentive to encourage promoters to come forward, so that
they will pay their pro-rata share and not somebody else's share," said Eric L. Smith, an
I.R.S. spokesman.
But promoters have not always seen shelter-related penalties as a barrier to doing
business. According to the Senate report, a 1998 memorandum written by Gregg W.
Ritchie, a former KPMG partner and one of the 19 indicted, concluded that aggressive
shelters were so profitable as to make the fines and penalties worth the risk.
Gary V. Mauney, a lawyer with Lewis & Roberts in Charlotte, N.C., who represents investors
suing the firms that sold them tax shelters, said of the I.R.S. offer yesterday: the "I.R.S. is
essentially following the logic of the Ritchie memo. Promoters are going to look at this
offer and laugh all the way to the bank."
markfox01 On October 29, 2018
innit!





Welshman in Brum.., United Kin
#2New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 09:04:42
lets tax thin air while there at it...
justvr On February 20, 2006




, Wallis and Futuna
#3New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 09:09:24
@markfox01 Said
lets tax thin air while there at it...


Well I'd propose a sliding scale depending on just how thin the air is, and how many need to
breathe it. If a lot need to breathe lets tax the s*** out of it on the users pays principle.. If
the air tends to be really thin lets designate difficulty breathing as desirable and tax it
harder.... and if we work the tax payers too hard and they start to die..... f*** em, lets bring
in death duties, probate fees.... funeral tax......
markfox01 On October 29, 2018
innit!





Welshman in Brum.., United Kin
#4New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 09:16:15
and lets bring in Visual tax, tax you if you can see, and the better you can see the more tax..

how much is inherence tax down under...its 45% over ?175,000 here.. didnt know it excisted till my mates Nan, died.. and then i couldnt beleive it!!
justvr On February 20, 2006




, Wallis and Futuna
#5New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 11:48:43
@markfox01 Said
and lets bring in Visual tax, tax you if you can
see, and the better you can see the more tax..

how much is inherence tax down under...its 45% over ?175,000 here.. didnt know it excisted
till my mates Nan, died.. and then i couldnt beleive it!!


? What you see is.... what you lose
markfox01 On October 29, 2018
innit!





Welshman in Brum.., United Kin
#6New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 11:49:49
yep!!
reiko On March 27, 2006

Deleted



New York, New York
#7New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 11:51:07
Tax is a dirty word in my home.
bendover On November 25, 2007

Deleted



Muff, Ireland
#8New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 11:51:43
@markfox01 Said
lets tax thin hair while there at it...


The Baldies of the world would be in severe difficulty then.

8)
markfox01 On October 29, 2018
innit!





Welshman in Brum.., United Kin
#9New Post! Feb 14, 2006 @ 11:52:34
@bendover Said
The Baldies of the world would be in severe difficulty then.

8)


you know what i just noticed my booboo...
jazzyjeff On February 18, 2006




Urayasu, Japan
#10New Post! Feb 18, 2006 @ 13:18:05
Here is some important info concerning the "income tax". The "income" tax is an excise tax, excise taxes are accessed base on activities or certain priviledges to do certain things, ie...sell guns. Are you involved in a taxable activity?
becki7 On July 28, 2006




Australia
#11New Post! Feb 18, 2006 @ 14:27:52
But isn't their a thing called confidentality?I thought they couldn't give up information like that or am I mistaking?
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Random
Sun Dec 05, 2010 @ 09:53
5 444
New posts   Politics
Tue Jul 13, 2010 @ 22:00
49 2720
New posts   Politics
Mon Jan 26, 2009 @ 10:30
3 310
New posts   Politics
Fri Sep 26, 2008 @ 19:03
6 477
New posts   Football (US)
Fri Feb 22, 2008 @ 19:16
14 1366