. If the voters “deserve” to know if our President is a part of criminal activity, then don’t the deserve to know about the ones shooting out these allegations?
We do know and are learning about "the ones shooting out these allegations".
> 17 U.S. intelligence agencies gave some details, of course much of that is classified information so what the public gets is limited.
> Some of the FISA information on Page has been made public.
> The plea deal with Flynn provided some of the information.
> The 20+ indictments provide much of the information.
> The indictment of Manafort provided some of the information.
> Gates' plea provide some information some of the information.
> Papadopoulos' plea provided some of the information.
So "the ones shooting out these allegations" include 17 US Intel agencies, Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Papodopoulos. Others will come to light at the investigation continues and eventually closes.
It is true that not all the facts have been provide, but the investigation is on going. Some things remain sealed or not openly discussed at this time.
However, much of the information has been made public already.
So far nothing has been made public about Trump. There are two possible reasons for this: 1) there is nothing, 2) there is something, but the investigation is not complete.
Again... FIVE CONVICTIONS
and over 20 indictments....
Note: (And correct me if I'm wrong) There is not a single democratic politician that has provided testimony in any of the trials, convictions , pleas or indictments. And the investigation is being run by a decorated Viet Nam war veteran, who is U.S. Marine and registered Republican. His boss is a registered Republican. His bosses boss is a registered Republican.
So, why don't you want to get to the bottom of this already successful investigation?