The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Presidential candidates. Show us (AZ) your circumcision papers!

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#1New Post! Apr 17, 2011 @ 23:33:42
https://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/04/arizona-gop-birther-obama-circumcision

Does that mean we can't have a female president if there are no other records available and the birthers won't accept one's found legal by the courts?
Leon On May 14, 2021




San Diego, California
#2New Post! Apr 17, 2011 @ 23:37:14
@shinobinoz Said

https://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/04/arizona-gop-birther-obama-circumcision

Does that mean we can't have a female president if there are no other records available and the birthers won't accept one's found legal by the courts?



Nah, if it is a Taliban daughter then we're good.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#3New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 00:01:19
@Leon Said

Nah, if it is a Taliban daughter then we're good.


I'm not sure that is very widely prescribed. And thankfully not!
crazylikeafox On June 02, 2017




McKinney, Texas
#4New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 09:17:04
@shinobinoz Said

https://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/04/arizona-gop-birther-obama-circumcision

Does that mean we can't have a female president if there are no other records available and the birthers won't accept one's found legal by the courts?


Be fair now. The article clearly says circumcision documents can be 1 of the many alternatives you can use if your state doesn't have birth certificates. Also I'm curious. What legal documents aren't covered in Arizona's bill? Not that it matters, since Obama has a certificate of live birth (a point that's been repeated ad nauseum here), and the law includes that as 1 of the alternatives.
johnywadd On June 06, 2011

Deleted



brisbane, Australia
#5New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 10:12:41
obama might have been born in indonesia? wasn't there a photo around of him dresses in his traditional muslim outfit? maybe he had the snip over there and the citificate will be hard to read as it's writen in indonesian.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#6New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 16:06:48
@crazylikeafox Said

Be fair now. The article clearly says circumcision documents can be 1 of the many alternatives you can use if your state doesn't have birth certificates. Also I'm curious. What legal documents aren't covered in Arizona's bill? Not that it matters, since Obama has a certificate of live birth (a point that's been repeated ad nauseum here), and the law includes that as 1 of the alternatives.


That is why I stated if you don't have the other forms you'd be stuck with exposing your genitals (so to speak)- or even if you do have the required documents and are President Obama!
crazylikeafox On June 02, 2017




McKinney, Texas
#7New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 21:34:38
@shinobinoz Said

That is why I stated if you don't have the other forms you'd be stuck with exposing your genitals (so to speak)- or even if you do have the required documents and are President Obama!


Which is why I also asked what state doesn't have any of the documents the bill would accept? And the fact Obama has the required documents means the bill WOULDN'T affect him at all. Quite the contrary, it would just make birthers in Arizona (the few there are) look even more ridiculous if they STILL question it. So really, what's the problem here?
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#8New Post! Apr 18, 2011 @ 21:52:47
@crazylikeafox Said

Which is why I also asked what state doesn't have any of the documents the bill would accept? And the fact Obama has the required documents means the bill WOULDN'T affect him at all. Quite the contrary, it would just make birthers in Arizona (the few there are) look even more ridiculous if they STILL question it. So really, what's the problem here?


Because they are trying to make it law? Because it shows the extreme and ridiculous attempts of the wacko righties?
crazylikeafox On June 02, 2017




McKinney, Texas
#9New Post! Apr 19, 2011 @ 00:57:16
@shinobinoz Said

Because they are trying to make it law? Because it shows the extreme and ridiculous attempts of the wacko righties?


You mean wacko birthers. But like I said it doesn't even matter because Obama STILL qualifies. In fact, you should be WANTING this to pass, because if it does and birthers still act like Obama's disqualified they'll only look more ridiculous to the rest of us. Heck, even though it would be dishonest, you could even try and paint all Republicans as ridiculous if this doesn't quite them. Really, it should be ME that has a problem, not you.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#10New Post! Apr 19, 2011 @ 01:36:42
@crazylikeafox Said

You mean wacko birthers. But like I said it doesn't even matter because Obama STILL qualifies. In fact, you should be WANTING this to pass, because if it does and birthers still act like Obama's disqualified they'll only look more ridiculous to the rest of us. Heck, even though it would be dishonest, you could even try and paint all Republicans as ridiculous if this doesn't quite them. Really, it should be ME that has a problem, not you.


What part of trying to pass laws did you miss?
Asme251 On December 21, 2017
Area Man





Boston, Massachusetts
#11New Post! Apr 19, 2011 @ 01:45:39
@crazylikeafox Said

You mean wacko birthers. But like I said it doesn't even matter because Obama STILL qualifies. In fact, you should be WANTING this to pass, because if it does and birthers still act like Obama's disqualified they'll only look more ridiculous to the rest of us. Heck, even though it would be dishonest, you could even try and paint all Republicans as ridiculous if this doesn't quite them. Really, it should be ME that has a problem, not you.


Well the bill kind of goes against the full faith and credit clause of the constitution since Arizona's secretary of state gets to determine whether a document from another state is valid or not. Of course, Republicans never really had issues with violating the constitution when it fits them.
crazylikeafox On June 02, 2017




McKinney, Texas
#12New Post! Apr 19, 2011 @ 05:10:14
@shinobinoz Said

What part of trying to pass laws did you miss?


Nothing at all. What part of "Obama would pass under such a bill, and as such it would only result in Birthers looking more ridiculous if they still doubt it" did YOU miss?

@Asme251 Said

Well the bill kind of goes against the full faith and credit clause of the constitution since Arizona's secretary of state gets to determine whether a document from another state is valid or not. Of course, Republicans never really had issues with violating the constitution when it fits them.


Oh I don't deny it's a pointless law and waste of Arizona taxpayer money. Politicians in general like doing that, though.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#13New Post! Apr 19, 2011 @ 05:12:29
@crazylikeafox Said

Nothing at all. What part of "Obama would pass under such a bill, and as such it would only result in Birthers looking more ridiculous if they still doubt it" did YOU miss?



Oh I don't deny it's a pointless law and waste of Arizona taxpayer money. Politicians in general like doing that, though.


Then you answered the question already!
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   News & Current Events
Wed Jul 18, 2012 @ 18:07
2 436
New posts   US Election 2012
Fri May 25, 2012 @ 01:23
7 972
New posts   Society & Lifestyles
Tue Jun 16, 2009 @ 00:40
27 1249
New posts   Society & Lifestyles
Mon Apr 20, 2009 @ 03:48
82 2832
New posts   Religion
Thu Jan 06, 2011 @ 04:24
33 3283