The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Presidential Impeachment!

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 ...7 8 9 · >>
Electric_Banana On April 20, 2024




, New Zealand
#31New Post! Aug 04, 2014 @ 00:18:41
@chaski Said

Yet another ignorant statement that fails to address either the facts nor the law.



It's obvious Green is being funny...

..I mean just imagine ol' Bill forcing Monica under his desk and then doing her like that monkey did that frog.
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#32New Post! Aug 04, 2014 @ 00:28:33
GAK won't dare respond to me, but he is most likely trying to refer to Habeas Corpus.... in which case he is wrong... to wit...

Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution allows for Abraham Lincoln's actions....

The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
mrmhead On March 27, 2024




NE, Ohio
#33New Post! Aug 04, 2014 @ 00:30:11
@GreenAppleKing Said

Unintentionally?

So, you're saying you didn't expect him to get the results he has gotten?

That's a noble thought.

I'm confident that he's known since day one what the end game was to be and he's right on schedule. All of this is part of the plan.


People slam him and damn him, and then they give him so much credit for pulling off a grand scheme and having so much power ... that everything is happening just as he intended ....

... So he's really a Bilderberg?
GreenAppleKing On April 23, 2015

Deleted



, United States (general)
#34New Post! Aug 04, 2014 @ 01:24:25
@mrmhead Said

People slam him and damn him, and then they give him so much credit for pulling off a grand scheme and having so much power ... that everything is happening just as he intended ....

... So he's really a Bilderberg?



we have two choices:

the leader of the free world is either competent or incompetant
chaski On April 19, 2024
Stalker





Tree at Floydgirrl's Window,
#35New Post! Aug 04, 2014 @ 01:46:24
@GreenAppleKing Said

we have two choices:

the leader of the free world is either competent or incompetant


Wrong again... due to you over simplifying the situation... as usual.

Or he is competent, but thwarted by the opposing political party, so appears incompetent.

Or he is competent, but only mediocre.

Or...

....there are many many "shades of grey"...



But, yet again, you won't answer, because you have neither the nerve nor the facts on your side.
mrmhead On March 27, 2024




NE, Ohio
#36New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 00:30:02
From CNN:
Quote:
With Congress mired in dysfunction over immigration, President Barack Obama says he'll do what he can to sidestep the legislative logjam.
One possibility: using presidential authority to remove the threat of possible deportation for a few million immigrants living illegally in the country, a step that conservatives decry as amnesty.


I couldn't get past that before laughing my a** off! Congress couldn't get anything done one way or another -approve more $$ to process, or kill the law requiring processing - So now Obama is going to pull an "I'll Show You!!"

Performing on a stool we've a sight to make you drool
Seven virgins and a mule, keep it cool, keep it cool
We would like it to be known the exhibits that were shown
Were exclusively our own, all our own, all our own

Come and see the show, come and see the show
Come and see the show
See the show
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#37New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 00:55:46
@GreenAppleKing Said

What? Clinton denied it and the Bimbo dismissal machine handled the rest yes?

Hmmm. Like Michael Jackson?

Sorry. Too many women denied not the least of which was Lewkinsky but that wasn't the worst. Clinton is a pathological predator and his party is all too eager to brush off as "just sex."


Uploaded at ImageFra.me


As I stated. NO proof.
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#38New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:01:32
@GreenAppleKing Said

I gave four last time. You stated that the bubble-gum man discounted this.

The last most comprehensive report was submitted by Ted Cruz in May 2014.

I won't take his thunder but you may read it here.

PDF from Cruz citing 76 examples of lawlessness from Chief Executive


Nope!
Politifact looked at Cruz's charges:

Our ruling

We found that at least seven presidents -- including some of the nation’s most admired occupants of the White House -- acted, at least on occasion, in ways that ignored specific laws or constitutional protections. It is not accurate to say, as Cruz does, that Obama would be "the first president we've ever had who thinks he can choose which laws to enforce and which laws to ignore." Presidents have done so frequently, and historians expect that they will continue to do so. We rate the claim False.

***

EDITOR’S NOTE, March 11, 2014: After we published our story, Cruz’s office provided the following response:

"Since the dawn of the republic, the president and Congress have resisted attempts from each other to encroach upon their constitutional powers. Many presidents have asserted, and have abused, executive authority. No one is arguing that President Obama is the first to make this mistake. As Sen. Cruz has detailed in three reports, a Wall Street Journal op-ed, and a brief before the U.S. Supreme Court, no president until President Obama has ever claimed the authority to ignore the explicit text of statutes passed by Congress and unilaterally replace that text with whatever the president wishes. From Obamacare to immigration, to same sex marriage, to marijuana laws, President Obama’s willingness to ignore or alter law is unquestionably outside the scope of executive power. It amounts to legislating, pure and simple."

However, we don’t agree that there’s a significant distinction between "abus(ing) executive authority" and a "willingness to ignore or alter law," so we feel comfortable with the historical examples we used to analyze Cruz’s statement. We’re standing by our original ruling of False.
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/mar/10/ted-cruz/ted-cruz-says-barack-obama-first-president-who-thi/
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#39New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:03:19
@GreenAppleKing Said

9 million

900 thousand entries

ouch

Whatever happened to "the seriousness of the charge outweighs the nature of evidence" ala Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill?

Oh well, that was twenty years ago. If we elect the Rapist In Chief's wife into office I'm sure he'll behave.


WWJD????

Throwing the first stone GAK????
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#40New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:04:35
@Leon Said

The Tea Party and the GOP need each other, as neither can survive on its own. However, they are bringing each other down. It's a caustic relationship that is doing nobody any good.


Shhhhhhhhh!
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#41New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:06:08
@Leon Said

I don't think I've ever seen a president that has unintentionally polarized our nation as much as Obama has. I have never seen anything like it, and I thought the vitriol directed at Reagan during his presidency was pretty bad. I still don't really understand fully what it is. Obama hasn't executed executive orders any more than Bush or other presidents did, hasn't pushed socialist measures any more than FDR or LBJ has. I don't want to say the R word, but maybe that's what it is, whether people want to admit, or even realize what it is. I cannot think of any other explanation.


It's always the result of backlash. First non-white president and all. "Someone's gotta pay"!!!!!
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#42New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:07:00
@chaski Said

Is it really Obama that has polarized our nation?

Or is it the GOP?

Or perhaps the media (both extreme left and extreme right) ?


Bingo! Spot on!
shinobinoz On May 28, 2017
Stnd w Standing Rock





Wichita, Kansas
#43New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:08:51
@GreenAppleKing Said

1. I know that Lincoln broke laws to preserve the Union so I myself don’t make the claim that Obama is the first in this.

2. None of the points Cruz made will be enough to justify impeachment with or without removal from office. There is absolutely nothing short of homeland invasion with dirty bombs that would persuade the majority of the American people that Obama must be impeached and removed. We will simply wait it out.


I suspect that Obama- Like Bush (remember 9-11?) will get the support of the us people and become even more popular should someone attack this country.
GreenAppleKing On April 23, 2015

Deleted



, United States (general)
#44New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:32:15
@shinobinoz Said

As I stated. NO proof.



None?
GreenAppleKing On April 23, 2015

Deleted



, United States (general)
#45New Post! Aug 05, 2014 @ 01:39:37
@shinobinoz Said
It is not accurate to say, as Cruz does, that Obama would be "the first president we've ever had who thinks he can choose which laws to enforce and which laws to ignore."



I understand this.

My point in citing Cruz' pdf

here

isn't to buttress the idea that Obama is the first to fail at his job.

My point in citing that pdf is to provide ample objective evidence in a case for impeachment of any other sitting president had they done what this person is doing now. There is absolutely nothing Obama could do to warrant impeachment and I'm actually grateful that no real momentum toward that end is taking place.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 ...7 8 9 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Wed Mar 07, 2007 @ 00:14
1 832
New posts   Politics
Mon Jun 16, 2008 @ 20:41
3 415
New posts   Pics & Videos
Wed May 09, 2007 @ 22:31
9 734
New posts   Random
Tue Mar 07, 2006 @ 04:55
2 263
New posts   Random
Sat Sep 01, 2012 @ 01:36
31 3669