The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums: Society & Lifestyles:
Law

Out-of-hand Masturbation...

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: 1 2 · >>
sTreetAngeL On April 22, 2021
root tedt ree





in a paradox,
#2New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:29:54
Well if they are doing it in front of guards, then that is akin to flashing in public and such.
But if they are in the privacy of their cells, who can fault them for that? For something we all do; it's human nature.
futilevoice On October 07, 2016

Deleted



, Illinois
#3New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:39:16
I thought about making a joke of this but if I were a prison guard I would be very offended by some inmate pulling his thing out in front of me. That is lewd and they should get more time for doing that. Maybe then it would stop.
sAeGeSpAeNe On September 20, 2021
Part-time Nidologist





The other Bristol..., Connecti
#5New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:44:06
I should have made the title read: Slight-of-hand....
maximillion On December 13, 2016




, Minnesota
#6New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:44:26
put posters up of their mums that should cure it
Silly_Me On April 22, 2020




In a cave, United Kingdom
#7New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:48:15
@maximillion Said

put posters up of their mums that should cure it



and their Grans
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#8New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 17:50:50
putting them on the sex offenders register is just f***ing stupid.
someone_else On August 30, 2012
Not a dude.


Deleted



American Alps, Washington
#10New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 18:02:37
@Silly_Me Said

I thought this was going to about a handless hand job as in...Look No Hands




So did I.
BozieFozie On August 08, 2017
Life's a Beach





Paradise, Florida
#13New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 19:06:58
@sAeGeSpAeNe Said

You and others seem to agree that it is a silly or stupid idea to be punishing these inmates for their depravity by labeling them sex-offenders.

Would it surprise anyone that this legislation (the proposed punishment) has been put forth and is being pushed by local Democrats?


No, nothing surprises me anymore, Saege!! I just think the punishment, in this case, doesn't match the crime.
sAeGeSpAeNe On September 20, 2021
Part-time Nidologist





The other Bristol..., Connecti
#14New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 19:33:56
From the proposed bill:

"To the extent that the violations continue after passage of the bill, costs will be incurred by the Department of Correction if prison sentences for violation of the statute exceed the terms of the offender. The bill specifies a penalty of up to five years in prison for violation of the statute. Prison sentences for violation of the statute will occur concurrently with an inmate's existing sentence. On average, it costs the Department of Correction $44,165 to incarcerate an offender annually.
Additionally, the bill levies a fine of up to $5,000 per violation, which will potentially increase Judicial Department revenues to the extent that fines are assessed in future cases."

So,... should this bill become law, if anyone is caught w**king off, they could expect to be sentenced, up to as much as 5 additional years in prison (at a cost of $44,165 per year). These costs would be offset by fining each offender $5000 per offense. But, if they are in jail, they can't earn or pay the fine... so, these inmates would be grinning from ear-to-ear, because they would be helping to cause the penal system to go bankrupt, and this situation would have been enabled by the clear-thinking Democrats of Connecticut. Imagine, if you will, a w**king protest-action...
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#15New Post! Apr 27, 2012 @ 20:04:03
@sAeGeSpAeNe Said

You and others seem to agree that it is a silly or stupid idea to be punishing these inmates for their depravity by labeling them sex-offenders.

Would it surprise anyone that this legislation (the proposed punishment) has been put forth and is being pushed by local Democrats?



yes it does surprise me, but then often in political parties there are elements that seem stupid.

The cost alone of putting them on the sex offenders register is stupid.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Be Respectful of Others

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Mon Jan 09, 2012 @ 20:50
0 760
New posts   Writing
Tue Apr 26, 2011 @ 21:52
0 2005
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Mon Sep 06, 2010 @ 02:29
3 1018
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Sun Aug 15, 2010 @ 16:47
1 462
New posts   Politics
Thu Aug 05, 2010 @ 13:52
53 2483