The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
News & Current Events

North/South Divide

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: 1 2 3 · >>
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#1New Post! Sep 27, 2010 @ 11:52:02
I was thinking about this earlier. The North/South divide seems to still be there as strong as ever. Looking at current poll's Labour are well ahead in almost every area of the North, but the Tories and satisfaction with the coalition is significantly more popular throughout almost all of the south.

Why is this still the case?

In the past it made sense as the north was less well-off with more working class people and industries. This is no longer the case though, with regeneration schemes making a difference in many area's the 'It's grim up north' tag is starting to wane, yet the political opinions haven't.

Looking at the East coast of Scotland, it's prosperous, one of the richest parts of the country, yet it is still Labour through and through.

Is this due to an attitude instilled from times gone by? Are people up here more compassionate than those down south or is there something else going on? Party loyalties that won't budge perhaps? What are your thoughts?
treebee On April 13, 2015
Government Hooker

Moderator




London, United Kingdom
#2New Post! Sep 27, 2010 @ 12:13:14
I think there are more middle/upper working class families in the south. They tend to lean more towards liberal and green policies. The "Waitrose" belt.

Also a lot of people in the south cant be arsed to vote either.
CRYSTALTIPS On January 01, 2011
Crystallized Gem


Deleted



, United Kingdom
#3New Post! Sep 27, 2010 @ 12:19:15
The tories will never be for working-class folk, and the tories will certainly never be for SCOTLAND.

Maggie Thatcher's f***in' poll tax given to Scotland first will never be forgotten up here, why did we get it first, because the Scots never vote the tories in. Couldn't stand that b**** of a woman.

You never forget your upbringing and tend to stick with what you know, whether that is right or wrong. Even if I agreed with some of tories policies, I would never vote for them because I know the poorest are always f***ed in the end by that lot.

As for SNP, even though I class myself as Scottish first and British second, I think it's a wasted vote.

Now we have morecambe and wise running the country - I don't trust that slimy "god aren't I gorgeous" (err no!) Nick Clegg.
Jennifer1984 On July 20, 2022
Returner and proud





Penzance, United Kingdom
#4New Post! Sep 27, 2010 @ 13:59:43
There was a saying going around, a few years back, that if you drew a line through the country from the Dee to the Ex (they're rivers), then about 70% of Britain's national wealth is produced to the south of the line. I don't know if that is true or not, but it was something that was bandied about a lot at the time.

At one time, many southerners tended towards the view that the North was dark and unpleasant but necessary. The North was the industrial pulse of the country. Everything was made in the North. The factories, shipyards, steel mills... you name it... they were all based in the north.

The working classes of the north thought of themselves as "Salt-of-the-earth" types. All "honest labour" and full of "Working class dignity" and therefore, as there were no factories in the south, southerners couldn't possibly have any of those attributes. Of course, that was ridiculous, but hell, it's not a big deal. So a few jibes were bandied about.. So what..?

Now, the coal industry of Yorkshire and the north east... the scottish shipyards... the milltowns of Lancashire.... engineering manufacturing in the West Midlands... are all gone and the northerners have lost that thing they identified with most. They've lost the thing that defined them.

And they resent that.

And yet, the south goes on, doing what it does being businesslike and still making at least, some wealth in these recessionary times.

At one time, northern working class dignity was a very real thing. But creeping socialist industrial ideology took decent, hardworking people and insinuated into them a culture of expecting "jobs for life". A young man would finish school at 15 and walk out of the school gates on Friday, in through the factory gates on Monday, where his dad, grand dad, uncles, brothers, and everybody else in his family worked, and he'd stay there until he either retired or died (whichever came first).

It was comforting. It was reassuring for him to know that his future was taken care of and as long as he put in his shift, everything was going to be wonderful.

The unions would ensure that standards of living were maintained and that was a good thing too... at first. But the unions soon became drunk with power and were infiltrated by industrial wreckers ... militant, hard liners with agendas that were definitely not in the best interests of the workers. By this time though, those workers had been seduced into believing the Animal Farm principle.... "Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad" turned into "Northern Workers Good, Southern Bosses Bad.

Hard line militancy beat down weak politicians, who wouldn't (couldn't?) take them on. The workers were seduced into believing that they didn't really have to work hard anymore... and there was no incentive to do so. Their jobs were secure... their future assured. Why work hard..? The socialist Utopia had arrived...!!

The unions stifled innovation (modern machines couldn't be allowed to take workers jobs). There was no money for investment (Workers pay packets had to be protected against inflation). It was a culture of stagnation brought about by an attitude that nothing would ever have to change. Everything was rosy in the socialist utopian workers paradise.

The steel workers, dockers, shipbuilders.... they didn't really have to work hard, all they had to do was make sure they clocked in and out at the right times, and what happened between was... well.... not really that important.

But it made Britain "The Sick Man Of Europe". Those factories, that were once the powerhouse of Britains economy were now producing outdated goods that were shoddily made, expensive, unattractive to buyers and were invariably late in being delivered or not delivered at all.

I have seen images from the 1970's where the old British Leyland car factory had a (biiiiiig) parking lot, full of thousands and thousands of cars that had been made, but couldn't be sold. Nobody would buy them. But, according to the unions, that wasn't their problem. They demanded that the government keep subsidising the factory in order to keep it open and protect jobs for people who were producing crap cars that nobody wanted. Even Leyland workers didn't drive the cars they manufactured..!! They were that bad.

The trades unions, and the indulgent Labour government of the 1970's brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy. I've read all about the Winter Of Discontent, where rubbish piled up in the streets, and they even prevented the dead from being buried in order to pursue some petty point..... "Working Class Solidarity" was the catch-all phrase used to justify anything.

This was the status quo that the north wanted to preserve, but Margaret Thatcher wasn't having it. No wonder she is so hated. If there was a class war in the 1980's, then the working classes of the north comprehensively lost it.

The miners of Yorkshire followed a deluded insurrectionist named Arthur Scargill in what he believed would be a glorious victory for socialism. It ended, for him, in ignominious defeat and humiliation and desolation for the Yorkshire miners No wonder there is resentment in the north.

I was born in 1984, when the pit strike was at its height. I have only ever seen the video footage of the rioting, the pitched battles with police, and I've read about the politics of it.

The reason for the north / south divide is clear. It's about the socialist ideology of the north versus the pragmatic "let's just make money" capitalist attitudes of the south. I'm not suggesting one is better or worse than the other, but at the end of the day, that's what it boils down to. What started out as a mild bit of local rivalry is now a real and bitter cause for enmity.

So, Scotland hates Thatcher because of the Poll Tax.? I agree that the Poll Tax was an unfair tax and it should never have come into existence, but it's over now, long gone and dead. Move on, for goodness sake.

And hey...... If Scots hate Thatcher that much, they should be grateful to the Pol Tax... it was the Poll Tax that actually brought Thatcher down..!! without it, she would probably have had another ten years in Downing Street. The glass can be half full, you know.

The north / south divide is very real and that's a shame, but it's the northerners that are perpetuating it with their simmering resentment and inability to get over the causes of it, and simply move on.

Down here, in the south, we don't think unkindly of northerners, as such. We tend to go about our business and do what we can to make the best go of life. We work hard, try to make money and attempt to build good businesses. Work smarter, not harder. Make products that somebody wants, produce them on time, to order, and at a price the buyer likes. It works, you know.

In pockets of the north, the southern working model is catching on but there is still a lot of the old mentality around, and the resentment that festers in the hollow bosoms of those who can't adapt to a changing world, is the real.... only..... reason why there is a north / south divide in this country.

The North / South divide exists. But it's mostly in the heads of northerners.


.
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#5New Post! Sep 27, 2010 @ 14:38:01
@Jennifer1984 Said

Now, the ... scottish shipyards... are all gone.



I think you're jumping the gun a little there.

What I wonder though is about the change in industry but the fact that most Scots are still left wing, including those who benefit from capitalism. I mean I grew up in Aberdeen where everyone was either employed by the public sector or the oil industry. As far as I can tell they have the complete opposite ideologies, yet people working in both industries tend to be left wing.

I get the impression (this is a generalisation) that people who work and benefit from the private sector tend to be right-wing down in the south of England, but this hasn't transcended so much to the north despite how the private sector is flourishing in parts.

It seems in Scotland that the three power house cities (Aberdeen, Glasgow and Edinburgh) are performing well, better than a lot of cities in the UK have done during the recession. There is a strong element of industry in all three cities yet a strong left-wing sentiment.

Edinburgh I find to be particularly interesting. The economy of Edinburgh relies on tourism and the finance industry, which has resulted it in becoming a very middle to upper middle class place, yet all four constituencies here are still retained by Labour. That doesn't seem to happen in middle class areas in England. As far as I could tell it was only working class areas or places with large pockets of poverty that returned a Labour MP at the recent election.

Is it enough to say that resentment of the Thatcher government still resinates so strongly that despite twenty years of change we dare not vote Tory? I am not sure. I think the average person on the street is more left-wing/social democrat than the average person in the south. I am again generalising, but as far as I can tell that seems to be the case. Even the Sun for all it's sensationalist bulls*** refused to back the Tories up here during the election.

I don't think it is merely the poll tax that put people against Thatcher though up here. I think it had something to do with the attitude, the Conservative party were deemed as an English party already, with far more support coming from England than Scotland. Then Thatcher looked at the controversial and right-wing policy and rather than roll it out everywhere decided to use Scotland as a testing ground. It seemed to be an attitude of, 'We won't lose votes from somewhere we have very few, we may as well test out our policies up there to see how they go before we risk our reputation amongst those who we actually need to vote for us.' I think that attitude turned people against the Tories as they essentially painted us as worthless.

I wonder if the Third Way satisfied the new found increase of middle-class pockets of people up here amongst those with a social conscience. A free-market economy with small pockets of socialist policy perhaps satisfied those who benefit from the free-market whilst doing enough for others that it doesn't make them feel guilty. After-all it wasn't the middle class who suffered under New Labour.

This makes me wonder what will happen to Labour under Ed Miliband. He is a social democrat and not a democratic socialist, nor however is he an advocate of the Third Way.

I think we will see the Labour party how it perhaps would have been under John Smith. What effect will this have on voters from the South and how different will that be to the reaction of those in the North?
Jennifer1984 On July 20, 2022
Returner and proud





Penzance, United Kingdom
#6New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 06:33:32
Oh goodness... I've only got fifteen minutes to reply, but I want to get it down before I leave for work.... Here goes....



A very good analysis, Jim, and I see you also mentioned John Smith. For my money, his unfortunate and untimely death was the biggest tragedy in politics to befall, not just the Labour Party, but all of Britain, since the war.

I think that, had he lived, he would have been one of the genuinely great Prime Ministers and Blair would probably still be a backbencher, or at best, have had only a very minor post in the cabinet. Smith would have seen right through him and would never have allowed Blair anywhere near an important job.

John Smith would never have taken Britain into two ruinous wars that have been so disastrous for our country. I think he would have stood up to Bush and simply said "No" in that quiet, but firm way of his. Every day in British politics, is a day when we miss John Smith.

As for your points about Scotland, it has to be said that Edinburgh and Glasgow have always been the cities they are. Glasgow has always had an industrial based economy and Edinburgh has always been tourism / finance, so there has been no radical change of emphasis, it's just that there is less industry than there was.

I'm not too au fait on how the actual mechanics of Aberdeen's structure works, but would I be right in assuming that most oil industry workers are quite transient..? Many of them come from all over the country, and mostly only use Aberdeen as a gateway point to the offshore rigs. Those workers who are employed shoreside tend to be of a contract nature and they come and go, never really affecting the make up of the electorate to any great degree. In all probability, many of them don't even bother to vote.

Am I way off beam here, or do you think there is something in that..?

The core of the voting populace in Aberdeen is therefore pretty much the same despite the oil boom and as I suggested earlier, they are born-and-bred Labourites who will never change, come what may.

Thatcher did a terrible thing to Scotland by using it as a testing ground for the Poll Tax, but it has to be said (Devil's Advocate hat on, here) that as a strategem, you could see where it was coming from. But that then begs the question.... Why, if it was so incredibly unpopular in Scotland, did she then introduce it in England too..? Surely, if the Scots hated it so much, she must have seen it was likely to arouse strong feelings south of the border too.

Was she badly advised..? Did she think she could ride it out..? Or was she just so arrogant that, by that time, that she thought she was invincible..?

I agree with you that the average person in the north is more socialistically inclined than the average southerner. Perhaps it is the demographic... London and the South East has been a melting pot of cultures coming from all over Europe for many hundreds of years, and people shifting from one place to another tend to be very independently minded, very entrepreneurial, and highly motivated to make their fortune wherever they settle. That influence has become ingrained in the southern culture now. It's had time to take root and influence the political aspirations of the majority of the people.

Not so in the north. The northern peoples tend to be more of one tribe (for want of a better word). The dynamic is different. Deprived of that long-term influx of capitalistic fortune seekers, the long-established pattern of life and working attitudes has remained inflexible and unchanging.

Mass immigration, in the north of England, is a much more recent phenomenon and despite scaremongering by the extremist right, immigrants still make up only a very small percentage of the voting public. Not enough to make that much of a difference. Yet.

There is even less immigration to Scotland. Perhaps that could account in some part for the situation. Scots have even less of that immigrant input than the northern English and notwithstanding their own business culture, have not had their socialist doctrines challenged by incomers demonstrating capitalism at the working class voter level.

All good discussion stuff, Jim, but I'm out of time. I'm already going to hit traffic as it is. LOL. Ho-hum.

Gotta go.


.
foosyerdoos On March 10, 2015




Aberdeen, United Kingdom
#7New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 09:09:39
@Jennifer1984 Said


Now, the coal industry of Yorkshire and the north east... the scottish shipyards... the milltowns of Lancashire.... engineering manufacturing in the West Midlands... are all gone and the northerners have lost that thing they identified with most. They've lost the thing that defined them.

And they resent that.

And yet, the south goes on, doing what it does being businesslike and still making at least, some wealth in these recessionary times.

.



You are right when you say that that the North lost the thing that defined them. They lost the industries that built the UK. The arse fell out of the market. The hard bit was losing it virtually overnight. This devastated communities, not individuals, whole communities. There was nothing put in place to soften this blow, there was little thought put in to what these communities were to do. No plan to compensate the losses. No new industry sourced by government to fill the void. Absolutely no forward thinking from the government of the day. The best the North got was flippant remarks about "getting on your bikes".
You're right! The North resented that. Can you blame them?
Now if only we could apply some parity when dealing with industries that involve traditionally more "right wing" voters. Banking and farming spring to mind. When the arse falls out of these markets, government falls over themselves to offer grants of billions. What's the difference? It's easy for "the South to go on" (stoically, through the adversity of being subjected to billions in aid) when government is willing to finance it!
I suspect that if these industries were abandoned by government in the same manner the South would resent that to the same degree!
Richard142 On February 15, 2015




Greater London, United Kingdom
#8New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 10:10:34
@Jennifer1984 Said

There was a saying going around, a few years back, that if you drew a line through the country from the Dee to the Ex (they're rivers), then about 70% of Britain's national wealth is produced to the south of the line. I don't know if that is true or not, but it was something that was bandied about a lot at the time.
At one time, many southerners tended towards the view that the North was dark and unpleasant but necessary. The North was the industrial pulse of the country. Everything was made in the North. The factories, shipyards, steel mills... you name it... they were all based in the north.
The working classes of the north thought of themselves as "Salt-of-the-earth" types. All "honest labour" and full of "Working class dignity" and therefore, as there were no factories in the south, southerners couldn't possibly have any of those attributes. Of course, that was ridiculous, but hell, it's not a big deal. So a few jibes were bandied about.. So what..?
Now, the coal industry of Yorkshire and the north east... the scottish shipyards... the milltowns of Lancashire.... engineering manufacturing in the West Midlands... are all gone and the northerners have lost that thing they identified with most. They've lost the thing that defined them.
And they resent that.
And yet, the south goes on, doing what it does being businesslike and still making at least, some wealth in these recessionary times.
At one time, northern working class dignity was a very real thing. But creeping socialist industrial ideology took decent, hardworking people and insinuated into them a culture of expecting "jobs for life". A young man would finish school at 15 and walk out of the school gates on Friday, in through the factory gates on Monday, where his dad, grand dad, uncles, brothers, and everybody else in his family worked, and he'd stay there until he either retired or died (whichever came first).
It was comforting. It was reassuring for him to know that his future was taken care of and as long as he put in his shift, everything was going to be wonderful.
The unions would ensure that standards of living were maintained and that was a good thing too... at first. But the unions soon became drunk with power and were infiltrated by industrial wreckers ... militant, hard liners with agendas that were definitely not in the best interests of the workers. By this time though, those workers had been seduced into believing the Animal Farm principle.... "Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad" turned into "Northern Workers Good, Southern Bosses Bad.
Hard line militancy beat down weak politicians, who wouldn't (couldn't?) take them on. The workers were seduced into believing that they didn't really have to work hard anymore... and there was no incentive to do so. Their jobs were secure... their future assured. Why work hard..? The socialist Utopia had arrived...!!
The unions stifled innovation (modern machines couldn't be allowed to take workers jobs). There was no money for investment (Workers pay packets had to be protected against inflation). It was a culture of stagnation brought about by an attitude that nothing would ever have to change. Everything was rosy in the socialist utopian workers paradise.
The steel workers, dockers, shipbuilders.... they didn't really have to work hard, all they had to do was make sure they clocked in and out at the right times, and what happened between was... well.... not really that important.
But it made Britain "The Sick Man Of Europe". Those factories, that were once the powerhouse of Britains economy were now producing outdated goods that were shoddily made, expensive, unattractive to buyers and were invariably late in being delivered or not delivered at all.
I have seen images from the 1970's where the old British Leyland car factory had a (biiiiiig) parking lot, full of thousands and thousands of cars that had been made, but couldn't be sold. Nobody would buy them. But, according to the unions, that wasn't their problem. They demanded that the government keep subsidising the factory in order to keep it open and protect jobs for people who were producing crap cars that nobody wanted. Even Leyland workers didn't drive the cars they manufactured..!! They were that bad.
The trades unions, and the indulgent Labour government of the 1970's brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy. I've read all about the Winter Of Discontent, where rubbish piled up in the streets, and they even prevented the dead from being buried in order to pursue some petty point..... "Working Class Solidarity" was the catch-all phrase used to justify anything.
This was the status quo that the north wanted to preserve, but Margaret Thatcher wasn't having it. No wonder she is so hated. If there was a class war in the 1980's, then the working classes of the north comprehensively lost it.
The miners of Yorkshire followed a deluded insurrectionist named Arthur Scargill in what he believed would be a glorious victory for socialism. It ended, for him, in ignominious defeat and humiliation and desolation for the Yorkshire miners No wonder there is resentment in the north.
I was born in 1984, when the pit strike was at its height. I have only ever seen the video footage of the rioting, the pitched battles with police, and I've read about the politics of it.
The reason for the north / south divide is clear. It's about the socialist ideology of the north versus the pragmatic "let's just make money" capitalist attitudes of the south. I'm not suggesting one is better or worse than the other, but at the end of the day, that's what it boils down to. What started out as a mild bit of local rivalry is now a real and bitter cause for enmity.
So, Scotland hates Thatcher because of the Poll Tax.? I agree that the Poll Tax was an unfair tax and it should never have come into existence, but it's over now, long gone and dead. Move on, for goodness sake.
And hey...... If Scots hate Thatcher that much, they should be grateful to the Pol Tax... it was the Poll Tax that actually brought Thatcher down..!! without it, she would probably have had another ten years in Downing Street. The glass can be half full, you know.
The north / south divide is very real and that's a shame, but it's the northerners that are perpetuating it with their simmering resentment and inability to get over the causes of it, and simply move on.
Down here, in the south, we don't think unkindly of northerners, as such. We tend to go about our business and do what we can to make the best go of life. We work hard, try to make money and attempt to build good businesses. Work smarter, not harder. Make products that somebody wants, produce them on time, to order, and at a price the buyer likes. It works, you know.
In pockets of the north, the southern working model is catching on but there is still a lot of the old mentality around, and the resentment that festers in the hollow bosoms of those who can't adapt to a changing world, is the real.... only..... reason why there is a north / south divide in this country.
The North / South divide exists. But it's mostly in the heads of northerners.
.

1, Depends what is ment by 'wealth'. the banks, through speculative "investment" generate cash flow and profits but avoid industrial investment for the long term. So while the 'south' may have more 'wealth' it's not productive.
2, sterio typing workers as lazy misses real experiance. I worked for a firm Reliable Plant Hire [sub contracting to the LEB] and the Irish workers ran rings arround me, a mere Limy. They may play hard but worked harder, doing more in half a day than many do in a full one. We picked up 'casual' labour from the Elephant & Castle area [of south London]. Great workers, all of them.
aceuvclubs On August 22, 2020
You with the face!





Seattle, Washington
#9New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 10:18:31
UK has North and South issues too huh? Interesting
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#10New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 15:28:33
I may be wrong on this but I think it's something like 75% of people in Aberdeen are either employed in the public sector or the Oil Industry.

I was quite amused in Philosophy today. I'm doing a Jurisprudence course and we were discussing theories behind Libertarianism and the free market. The tutor asked us whether we agreed with Nozick's view individually (He is right-wing, or at least his view we were discussing is) and without fail everyone from the South of England said they agreed with him at least in theory and everyone from the North of England and Scotland disagreed with his point saying he was too right wing.

The only actual exception was by the Tutor himself who is from the south but is quite obviously very left-wing (oddly enough I don't think I've had a single right-wing philosophy tutor, odd that).
SparklyKatie On March 07, 2014
\m//O_O\\m/





Sheffield, United Kingdom
#11New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 15:33:01
It doesn't help the government cutting schemes and funding back more in the North than in the South either.
Bimbo On November 16, 2010

Deleted
Banned



, Monaco
#12New Post! Sep 28, 2010 @ 15:55:11
@Jennifer1984 Said

There was a saying going around, a few years back, that if you drew a line through the country from the Dee to the Ex (they're rivers), then about 70% of Britain's national wealth is produced to the south of the line. I don't know if that is true or not, but it was something that was bandied about a lot at the time.

At one time, many southerners tended towards the view that the North was dark and unpleasant but necessary. The North was the industrial pulse of the country. Everything was made in the North. The factories, shipyards, steel mills... you name it... they were all based in the north.

The working classes of the north thought of themselves as "Salt-of-the-earth" types. All "honest labour" and full of "Working class dignity" and therefore, as there were no factories in the south, southerners couldn't possibly have any of those attributes. Of course, that was ridiculous, but hell, it's not a big deal. So a few jibes were bandied about.. So what..?

Now, the coal industry of Yorkshire and the north east... the scottish shipyards... the milltowns of Lancashire.... engineering manufacturing in the West Midlands... are all gone and the northerners have lost that thing they identified with most. They've lost the thing that defined them.

And they resent that.

And yet, the south goes on, doing what it does being businesslike and still making at least, some wealth in these recessionary times.

At one time, northern working class dignity was a very real thing. But creeping socialist industrial ideology took decent, hardworking people and insinuated into them a culture of expecting "jobs for life". A young man would finish school at 15 and walk out of the school gates on Friday, in through the factory gates on Monday, where his dad, grand dad, uncles, brothers, and everybody else in his family worked, and he'd stay there until he either retired or died (whichever came first).

It was comforting. It was reassuring for him to know that his future was taken care of and as long as he put in his shift, everything was going to be wonderful.

The unions would ensure that standards of living were maintained and that was a good thing too... at first. But the unions soon became drunk with power and were infiltrated by industrial wreckers ... militant, hard liners with agendas that were definitely not in the best interests of the workers. By this time though, those workers had been seduced into believing the Animal Farm principle.... "Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad" turned into "Northern Workers Good, Southern Bosses Bad.

Hard line militancy beat down weak politicians, who wouldn't (couldn't?) take them on. The workers were seduced into believing that they didn't really have to work hard anymore... and there was no incentive to do so. Their jobs were secure... their future assured. Why work hard..? The socialist Utopia had arrived...!!

The unions stifled innovation (modern machines couldn't be allowed to take workers jobs). There was no money for investment (Workers pay packets had to be protected against inflation). It was a culture of stagnation brought about by an attitude that nothing would ever have to change. Everything was rosy in the socialist utopian workers paradise.

The steel workers, dockers, shipbuilders.... they didn't really have to work hard, all they had to do was make sure they clocked in and out at the right times, and what happened between was... well.... not really that important.

But it made Britain "The Sick Man Of Europe". Those factories, that were once the powerhouse of Britains economy were now producing outdated goods that were shoddily made, expensive, unattractive to buyers and were invariably late in being delivered or not delivered at all.

I have seen images from the 1970's where the old British Leyland car factory had a (biiiiiig) parking lot, full of thousands and thousands of cars that had been made, but couldn't be sold. Nobody would buy them. But, according to the unions, that wasn't their problem. They demanded that the government keep subsidising the factory in order to keep it open and protect jobs for people who were producing crap cars that nobody wanted. Even Leyland workers didn't drive the cars they manufactured..!! They were that bad.

The trades unions, and the indulgent Labour government of the 1970's brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy. I've read all about the Winter Of Discontent, where rubbish piled up in the streets, and they even prevented the dead from being buried in order to pursue some petty point..... "Working Class Solidarity" was the catch-all phrase used to justify anything.

This was the status quo that the north wanted to preserve, but Margaret Thatcher wasn't having it. No wonder she is so hated. If there was a class war in the 1980's, then the working classes of the north comprehensively lost it.

The miners of Yorkshire followed a deluded insurrectionist named Arthur Scargill in what he believed would be a glorious victory for socialism. It ended, for him, in ignominious defeat and humiliation and desolation for the Yorkshire miners No wonder there is resentment in the north.

I was born in 1984, when the pit strike was at its height. I have only ever seen the video footage of the rioting, the pitched battles with police, and I've read about the politics of it.

The reason for the north / south divide is clear. It's about the socialist ideology of the north versus the pragmatic "let's just make money" capitalist attitudes of the south. I'm not suggesting one is better or worse than the other, but at the end of the day, that's what it boils down to. What started out as a mild bit of local rivalry is now a real and bitter cause for enmity.

So, Scotland hates Thatcher because of the Poll Tax.? I agree that the Poll Tax was an unfair tax and it should never have come into existence, but it's over now, long gone and dead. Move on, for goodness sake.

And hey...... If Scots hate Thatcher that much, they should be grateful to the Pol Tax... it was the Poll Tax that actually brought Thatcher down..!! without it, she would probably have had another ten years in Downing Street. The glass can be half full, you know.

The north / south divide is very real and that's a shame, but it's the northerners that are perpetuating it with their simmering resentment and inability to get over the causes of it, and simply move on.

Down here, in the south, we don't think unkindly of northerners, as such. We tend to go about our business and do what we can to make the best go of life. We work hard, try to make money and attempt to build good businesses. Work smarter, not harder. Make products that somebody wants, produce them on time, to order, and at a price the buyer likes. It works, you know.

In pockets of the north, the southern working model is catching on but there is still a lot of the old mentality around, and the resentment that festers in the hollow bosoms of those who can't adapt to a changing world, is the real.... only..... reason why there is a north / south divide in this country.

The North / South divide exists. But it's mostly in the heads of northerners.


.


London also has a significant industrial past. Especially for dockyards. You don't find rigid Labour support wholesale among families round here in London like you do up North, so in that sense there is a very real division in political culture at least.
Jennifer1984 On July 20, 2022
Returner and proud





Penzance, United Kingdom
#13New Post! Sep 29, 2010 @ 06:38:24
@Bimbo Said

London also has a significant industrial past. Especially for dockyards. You don't find rigid Labour support wholesale among families round here in London like you do up North, so in that sense there is a very real division in political culture at least.



I know all about the London docklands, Bim.... I was born in Greenwich and grew up in South London. The docklands of south and east London were always very hard core areas of Labour support, and they too suffered under Thatcher. Since then, there has been regeneration of the area and that has led to a (slight, but significant) shift of voting patterns away from the hard left in recent years.

It is true that there was some industry in the south (the Kent coalfields, for example), but they tended to be 'pockets' of industrialisation.... not seriously affecting the big picture in the same way that they affected the north.

Taking into account the example of how the regeneration of the London docklands is affecting voting patterns, do you think Thatcher might have missed a trick in not giving money to the north and thus possibly changing the political landscape, or do you think it would have been "a lot of money for small political reward"? (that is, the north would have taken the money and still voted Labour anyway)

Jim... I'd like to have a think about your last post. Good points, my friend. Gotta be off now, though... duty calls. LOL. Have a good day.


.
Bimbo On November 16, 2010

Deleted
Banned



, Monaco
#14New Post! Sep 29, 2010 @ 22:46:16
@Jennifer1984 Said

I know all about the London docklands, Bim.... I was born in Greenwich and grew up in South London. The docklands of south and east London were always very hard core areas of Labour support, and they too suffered under Thatcher. Since then, there has been regeneration of the area and that has led to a (slight, but significant) shift of voting patterns away from the hard left in recent years.

It is true that there was some industry in the south (the Kent coalfields, for example), but they tended to be 'pockets' of industrialisation.... not seriously affecting the big picture in the same way that they affected the north.

Taking into account the example of how the regeneration of the London docklands is affecting voting patterns, do you think Thatcher might have missed a trick in not giving money to the north and thus possibly changing the political landscape, or do you think it would have been "a lot of money for small political reward"? (that is, the north would have taken the money and still voted Labour anyway)

Jim... I'd like to have a think about your last post. Good points, my friend. Gotta be off now, though... duty calls. LOL. Have a good day.


.



I can see examples of regen from my window, lol. Thatcher wasn't anything to do with London Docks - they were well finished by the 60's. No-one up North would have cared a toss about Thatcher whatever she did, and most of the families round here who might have been tory voters hated her too, lol.
Jennifer1984 On July 20, 2022
Returner and proud





Penzance, United Kingdom
#15New Post! Sep 30, 2010 @ 12:23:46
No-one up North would have cared a toss about Thatcher whatever she did, <<< Bimbo (self confessed)


Funny...... that's not the sort of message I'm picking up from the northerners on this thread.

It seems the entire world hated Margaret Thatcher.... and then went and voted for her. I'm inclined to wonder how she won so many general elections (before my time, of course)

This utter pariah, who just kept on winning elections.... how does that happen..?


.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2 3 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Be Respectful of Others

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Random
Sat Jul 31, 2010 @ 16:43
4 651
New posts   UK Elections & Politics
Tue May 11, 2010 @ 16:30
44 3547
New posts   TFS+
Sun Oct 18, 2009 @ 23:19
22 1056
New posts   Local
Tue Sep 02, 2008 @ 00:54
102 3953
New posts   Politics
Tue Oct 10, 2006 @ 18:28
9 560