The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums: Politics:
Animal Rights

Moral Behavior and Moral Significance

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
rogy On June 03, 2013




, United Kingdom
#1New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 17:11:12
Recent blog entry by law professor and animal rights philosopher, G.L. Francione: https://www.abolitionistapproach.com/?p=458


rogY
crankshaft On May 10, 2009

Banned



,
#2New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 18:03:36
Rogy always brings out this intense yen for a triple bacon cheeseburger and a pitcher of beer.
crankshaft On May 10, 2009

Banned



,
#3New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 18:18:57
I can almost feel the hot bacon grease running down my chin.
2nd_Evil_Head On March 24, 2015




Elmira,
#4New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 18:19:48
Okay, I only read the first paragraph, but any putz that calls animals "non-humans" is probably trying to get between me and the deer I'm trying to shoot for food. We are human, they are animals, and they have no rights that we did not bestow upon them first. I'm not advocating animal cruelty, and I have more pets than your average Joe, because I do love and appreciate animals, but I also love to hunt them, and eat them.

They are animals, not people. The belief that animals share the same level as humans is indicative of an over-comfortable, over-abundant society, in short, people who think like this are too soft.
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#5New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 18:19:56
At least wait til he's back online to start trolling and baiting the OP.
Dark_Tink On December 30, 2018
<3 Boobie <3





, Canada
#6New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 18:25:43
Mmmmmmmm Chicken, pork, steak....still good eating. Yup Yup!





OMG If you're going to give a neg kudo, be 'brave' enough and sign your name.
rogy On June 03, 2013




, United Kingdom
#7New Post! Apr 20, 2009 @ 21:35:24
@Dark_Tink Said

Mmmmmmmm Chicken, pork, steak....still good eating. Yup Yup!





OMG If you're going to give a neg kudo, be 'brave' enough and sign your name.



Mmmm rashers: https://human-nonhuman.blogspot.com/2009/03/mmmmm-rashers.html
Alanna On February 13, 2010




Cincinnati,
#8New Post! May 13, 2009 @ 22:42:45
@2nd_Evil_Head Said

Okay, I only read the first paragraph, but any putz that calls animals "non-humans" is probably trying to get between me and the deer I'm trying to shoot for food. We are human, they are animals, and they have no rights that we did not bestow upon them first. I'm not advocating animal cruelty, and I have more pets than your average Joe, because I do love and appreciate animals, but I also love to hunt them, and eat them.

They are animals, not people. The belief that animals share the same level as humans is indicative of an over-comfortable, over-abundant society, in short, people who think like this are too soft.


Many animals are far superior to many human males.
adrinachrome On April 04, 2023




Fukitall, Arizona
#9New Post! May 13, 2009 @ 22:44:55
@Alanna Said

Many animals are far superior to many human males.



The same can be said for human females. Case and point the sloth
Thranduil On August 31, 2013




QUINCY, Kentucky
#10New Post! Jul 22, 2009 @ 20:32:25
Heads to KFC for really good chicken!!
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Recreation
Wed Mar 21, 2012 @ 05:46
10 1622
New posts   Animal Rights
Mon Jan 11, 2010 @ 23:24
37 3982
New posts   Animal Rights
Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 09:55
32 2064
New posts   Animal Rights
Thu Oct 01, 2009 @ 10:44
74 4096
New posts   Biology
Wed Jul 22, 2009 @ 10:14
23 3104