Jesus names as evil those who think his Father would break heavenly law and have him sacrificed.

Not in the least. You asked a question, and I was wondering what if any validity that question had. As I see it, it has none.

I'm getting that deja vu feeling again...

Have I posted this video in response to you before?

I can promise you, at the end of all of this, the only person you will have to attest your value to is yourself.

Can you think of times in the past where someone has lent you critical aid when they were not obligated to even have to speak to you?

Do you realize there are not many parts of our body that do not experience pain and that it takes quite a bit of excessive pain for our hearts to give out?

Like pain from an untreated illness? Starvation? Exposure to the elements?

Can you see how many who could've easily removed that pain and frightening death from some but proudly have not and instead inflicted it in selfish interest?

And if the time comes when they understand all and they come into question if their love is of any use or value to anyone else?

Ask yourself what you most desire to enable.

Do your prefer enabling fear? Do you prefer to keep in circulation that individuals have no ultimate say over themselves? Do you prefer to subliminally remind them of how powerless they may be? Is Jesus H Christ everyones' "Glass Ceiling"?

When you get to the end of this and look back upon what you enabled and what you encouraged to continue on - Were your innuendos and asides kind and for the better nurturing of others or were they only to protect yourself (from potential no-goodnics) at the cost of others' confidence?

I don't think I've ever disagreed with that. I'm not 100% sure what you mean though.




Yes, I think. Again, it depends on what you mean by critical aid.




Okay.





Oh sure.




Yes. I can also individuals who could've easily removed that pain from themselves yet refused out of pride or stubbornness.

"Too proud" does not just describe those who won't give.




I'm not reading this as a complete thought. Sorry.




Why would I want to do that?




Does not compute. Again, I'm sorry.

Ok, so then let's say this is all a head game involving Linguistics.

And let's say that what is being backhandedly taught is that the person speaking means well but the person interpreting is overly suspicious and ironically taking in, what is being said, for the alternative and more derogatory way the same words can be perceived...

..I would theory that defaulting suspicion (from most humans) to be result of living in an existence where everything is delivered to them backhandedly.

I'll have to say I'm more than a little bit confused as to why you asked me a series of questions only to rudely ignore every one of my answers.

As for the rest of what you're saying here, I only understand the end sentence.

Also...I had to jump back from quote to quote to remind myself what you were responding to. This was the content of that post:

"No, it's really not. Have you ever heard of the phrase "ignorance of the law is not exemption from the law?"

If it is a fact, it is a fact whether you believe it or not. I cannot prove it is a fact, that I will admit, but that doesn't change the nature of a "fact."


These trains of thought really don't seem to connect to me. Were they supposed to?

And no, I'm not "GreatestIAm" <----(what a f***ed up statement to make)

I believe that no one should be affected by gravity if they do not want to be.

I believe we are only currently affected by gravity by having been brought into a situation where gravity is a concern for us.

As a one-off to see if the individual appreciates an existence where in they are affected by gravity that is understandable

but if a continued abduction against the subject's will....

Like most pedophiles - abductors are not respecting other sentient life.

It is a law (and I know that I can not prove it) that if one life holds no respect for another and it's respect-less existence continues to be a burden on other sentient life - that life will be eventually terminated like a bacteria which is harmful to a system.

So I can both ignore and avoid the law of gravity by simply committing suicide.

And once beyond a system with no such restraints, if I still exist afterwards, I can proceed forward to make sure that I am never brought into any future existences where a concept like 'Gravity' may serve a problem.

I can not prove what I've said above but you just simply have to respect that a "Fact" is a Fact.

Indeed.

I'm fully aware that you are not GreatestIAm. However, that post was the one that you chose to quote in order to speak to (presumably) me. I thought you wanted to address that particular line of thought but evidently I was mistaken.





Okay. Thanks.

Just note that I'm not the only one misinterpreting innuendos.

But now you and other similars reading have a very honest example of how some things said are taken.

Okay. Thanks.

If someone were to publish a book containing the material from these past two pages I'm pretty sure that I would be the most interesting read.

Probably.

No, no. A Ricardo or Jose will do... I pay $5/hr.

I'm actually following you so far, but disagree with this. You're applying categorically something that only holds water on an individual basis. Defaulting suspicion does not exist in everyone and in those it does exist in, it doesn't always apply to everyone. I am usually quick to be critical of some individuals because of what I know about them as individuals, not because everything in my life has been delivered to me "backhandedly," but because I mistrust some people for individual reasons. Which we all should, shouldn't we? Aren't there some individuals we ought not to trust?

I know...we shouldn't trust anyone but ourselves right?

But there are a lot of people I do not default to suspicion with, and I would guess that most people who are not you have a lot of people they also do not default to suspicion with.

You are paranoid, Electric. I am not calling you a name or putting you down for it, I'm really not, but you are simply paranoid of anyone who isn't you and I say that with no malice. Perhaps it's fruitless for me to say that because you probably don't trust me either and I can't blame you for that. But words are not always offered out of intention to inflict harm or foment weakness in others, and if you really believe that I can't change that and neither can anyone else.

I think we are at an impasse.

Pretty much.

We're thrown into an undisclosed territory by and undisclosed host. While growing up and innocently attempting to accept the world around us with open arms we are taught deception via having it imposed on us - Seemingly as punishment for being for being naive and not questioning the territory we haphazardly run through.

I'm not saying that everyone has the habit of talking around their agenda but it appears to be part of the job description for the few who will bother to have anything to do with us during our lifetime.