@GreatestIam2 Said
Is a religion based on human sacrifice moral and ethical?
Over the ages, a number of pagan religions have based their theology around the notion that God needs or wants sacrifices. This phenomena has been recorded on many continents from various tribes and peoples who had no knowledge of each other.
I find it strange that God, any God, would be pleased or able to be bribed by some sacrifice, be it human or not. Seems like it is just humans thinking they can somehow change God’s mind about anything from the weather, the forgiveness of sin or a better crop.
Can God be bribed by accepting burnt offerings such as virgins being thrown into volcanoes, meat or crops?
Can God be bought off so cheaply?
What of Jesus our brother?
Psalm 49:7
None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
If Christianity is based on human sacrifice, it seems to me that that would be immoral and unethical. It would mean that the innocent was murdered while the guilty were allowed to walk away. That is not good justice. Good justice says that the guilty pay and the innocent go free.
Is religious human sacrifice moral, ethical and good justice?
Regards
DL
The issue of human sacrifice, in the case of Jesus Christ is not as simple as it may.
God's own principle of Justice, like for like, demanded that the only ting that could buy back the right to perfect human life was the sacrifice of another human being.
That posed two seemingly impossible problems.
Firstly, there was of course, no other perfect human, so one would need to be created.
Secondly if one were created, how could that be said to be justice because that would mean that there would be one person, who though perfect and therefore having the right to eternal human life, would have to give up that right forever.
So, how was that to be accomplished to get God's original purpose back on course and yet be fair to all?
The answer was simple, in God's eyes. Provide a perfect human body with a ready made personality that could then rightfully continue it's life after having given up the right to perfect human life.
That meant a spirit creature had to agree to have it's entire personalty implanted in a human body, go through all the suffering and death that would result, and then be returned to it's spirit existence afterwards. After all ti would only be it's right to perfect human life it has given up, not the right to it's spirit existence.
Gad had already worked out that He would also need a King to take charge of things while He could no longer do so.
Who better to fill all those roles than His own son, who had worked with Him throughout the rest of creation, had displayed had made plain by actions his great love for the humanity he had helped create? His faithfulness would be tested under the harshest possible conditions and so would demonstrate to all his suitability to take up the kingship and organise the return of humanity to the perfection he had "bought" for them.
So it was sorted. His son was allowed to create a perfect human in Mary's womb, and have his own personality implanted in the foetus.
The rest, as they say, is history.
So all that was really sacrificed was a human body, there mere flesh blood and bone, and the personality within it lives on in the one who "donated" it in the first place.
The perfect solution.