@JulianLee Said
Having a positive racial identity is both good, and natural. (Unless you are living in an unnatural society with enemies who teach you to hate yourself, I mean.) Loving and appreciating your own people, too, is good and natural. So if "racism" means having a positive racial identity, and loving your own people, "racism" must be a good thing.
Because that word has been turned into a negative buzzword (by a people who love themselves and consider themselves a superior race, incidentally), I prefer to use the word "racialism" or "racial awareness," etc.
Love your people. White Europeans, love your heritage and stand up for it. Reject their bull---- buzzwords intended to kill you off.
Language can be anything you want it to be, Julian. We use words as we wish. Words can change their definitions according to their usage in common parlance. If, forty years ago, you had asked somebody if they feel gay today, they might have smiled and offered you a positive answer. Ask that question today and there is a possibility that you might just get your face punched..!!
Q.E.D.
And so for some people the first definition of "Racist" has become a perjorative and I don't have a problem with that. Racism in the sense of being an evil within our society is a very real evil. We ignore, or even downplay it, at our peril.
It is all too easy to put a positive... or at the very least, less condemnatory..... spin on what Hitler did by manipulating the fine interpretation of certain writings, or actions. It is quite possible that Hitler did give his raincoat to a tramp at some time. It is quite possible that he was kind to some children. That doesn't make him a saint and it certainly doesn't exonerate him from his actions in starting World War II.... The Holocaust... The excesses of the Shutz Staffel, or the Sturmablietung before them. All of these things happened on the express orders of The Fuhrer.
In all the systems of government in Nazi Germany, any law could be passed, any force could be enacted simply by saying "It is the will of The Fuhrer". There was no democratic process to hamper his ambition or the excesses which he believed would achieve it. Hitler's will stood above all and he gave the orders. He is therefore responsible and had he given a million coats to a million tramps, it would not exonerate him one iota.
Hitler understood that violence could be a path to achievement and he embraced that concept wholeheartedly. He may have shown some small degree of compassion to individuals with whom he had personal, face-to-face contact, but he cared not a jot for the faceless millions who were mere numbers to him. If they stood in the way of what he wanted to achieve, he was prepared to have them exterminated by any means at his disposal.
His entire political concept was based on what he understood to be "Race". Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Fuhrer. Everybody who existed outside of that concept was expendable.....particularly the Jews. They were singled out for
special treatment.
It is not possible to rehabilitate such a man in history. The weight of evidence against him is simply too strong. No form of words, nor interpretation of language can possibly eradicate what was done.
He was a monster, and I think History would be justified in recording him as such for all time.
.