@mr_ash Said
Of course everyone has a right to live. That doesn't give someone the right to health care. You are arguing a different cause.
If a country hasn't got enough money to pay for 'free' health care, then rights are obstructed by realities.
What other rights then would you say should be taken from you next? The right to live doesn't just cover whether or not someone is alive or dead. The right to live means that, as a human, you have the right to do what you need to so as you ensure your longevity. Some people need help so they can eat, but, there really is not enough money for that... should they give up their right to eat and just starve?
There is a certain level of responsibility on the community as a whole to instill values that help one fend for themselves, but, a community is just that, you help when help is needed.
There needs to be a line drawn, yes, when that help becomes mooching, and giving to them is no longer helping them, but, if you give the correct help, you should never have to reach that line.
@mr_ash Said In our country we had a 'live aid' thing many many years ago. It helped millions of people. I can't argue with helping people. I also put money in.
I now wonder where I put my money. What was created was more poverty. Because the people that were helped raised the population. Tell me brother, did I do right by giving money? or I have done wrong by creating more poverty and death?
I honestly don't know, that wasn't a rhetorical question Sir.
No, you did right, bc it was no you who caused the poverty. For all you know, the money you gave went to a widowed mother and her three children who is now working to put those children through college.