@Erimitus Said
H40: Could you give me an example of an initial effect of a chain reaction that was uncaused?
E: The big bang
H40 I'm not sure if nothing can be the cause of everything, so just trying to think more into it, incase i'm missing something.
E: I too am not sure that nothing can be the cause of everything. Actually I cannot imagine any way that it could.
And I too have this feeling that I am missing something. And ...and I have a feeling that those who know are laughing.
H40: ...isn't nothing actually something?
Premise: Nothing is something.
Erimitus:
~ good question. I do not know the answer. I suppose it depends on how we define the terms 'nothing' and 'something'.
Something, in this context, I would say, is a spatial. entity.
Nothing (i.e., no-thing) is the absence of any spatial entities.
Semantics'
Premise: Something (some-thing) is a spatial entity
Premise: Nothing (no-thing) is the absence of any spatial entities.
If: something is a spatial entity
and if: nothing is the absence of any spatial entities.
then: nothing is not something.
Premise: Matter (spatial entities) is condensed energy
Premise: energy is rarefied matter (i.e., not a spatial entity)
If: matter (spatial entities) is condensed energy
and: energy is rarefied mater. (i.e., not a spatial entity)
Then: matter and energy are different forms of the same thing.
Premise: matter and energy are different forms of the same thing
Premise: matter (spatial entities) is something
Premise: energy (a non-spatial entity) and matter (spatial entities) are something
If: matter and energy are different forms of the same thing
and: matter is something
Then: energy is something.
There was an experiment a few years back, that sucked "everything" out of a room and they found there was still something. I've been looking but can't find it, I'll post it if i come across it. I don't remember the details though.