The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Religion & Philosophy

Creationism in science class

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: 1 2 3 4 · >>
Should creationism be taught in school science classes?
Yes
No
View Results
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#1New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:48:17
Cast your votes!

The teaching of creationism in schools is a controversial topic. Many proponents of creationism, primarily Christians, have argued that creationism ought to be taught alongside the mainstream scientific account of natural history in school science classes. They argue that it is only fair that all accounts are treated equally. Many religious parents feel that the authority of their beliefs are being undermined by the exclusive teaching of scientific accounts which disagree with their faith systems.

The scientific community, the government and the majority of parents in the UK are against the teaching of creationism in school science, preferring it to be examined in Religious Studies classes. In the US, the topic is more controversial, with the majority of the population being Christian and almost half attending church, and religion having a stronger influence on politics.

What's your opinion? Is it unfair to only teach the mainstream scientific account and leave out alternative theories? Or is creationism unscientific and unsuitable for science class?
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#2New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:50:42
I was reading somewhere that creationism being taught in schools is more popular here than any other western country, because of our 'liberal' idea's on other cultures we support creationism being taught in Muslim schools to encourage them to keep their separate identity.
deeFXCKINGjay On January 21, 2012
Bannned





, Kazakhstan
#3New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:52:19
I think it should be taught, but in RE class, alongside every other religious creation theories.
sugarflyguy On March 15, 2010
Pro-Pho-tographer


Deleted



Leaving TFS today:), United Ki
#4New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:53:48
@deeFXCKINGjay Said

I think it should be taught, but in RE class, alongside every other religious creation theories.



As I was going to say that +1
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#5New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:54:35
@jmo Said

I was reading somewhere that creationism being taught in schools is more popular here than any other western country, because of our 'liberal' idea's on other cultures we support creationism being taught in Muslim schools to encourage them to keep their separate identity.



Faith schools and state schools are are different issue altogether.

I don't think we should be encouraging seperation or division of any kind.
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#6New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:55:31
@buffalobill90 Said

Faith schools and state schools are are different issue altogether.

I don't think we should be encouragin seperation or division of any kind.



Nor me, in the west coast it was odd. I was asked once whether I went to a Catholic school or a Protestant school. I insisted I went to a state school, he insisted that it was a Protestant school.

Taig bastard.
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#7New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:55:42
@deeFXCKINGjay Said

I think it should be taught, but in RE class, alongside every other religious creation theories.



@sugarflyguy Said

As I was going to say that +1



Then please vote 'no'. I'd like as many responders as possible.
sugarflyguy On March 15, 2010
Pro-Pho-tographer


Deleted



Leaving TFS today:), United Ki
#8New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:57:34
Orite, didn't see the science bit
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#9New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 13:59:30
@sugarflyguy Said

Orite, didn't see the science bit



Yeah, the writing above polls is hard to make out because of the crap colour scheme. I'm taking it up with the management!
sister_of_mercy On March 11, 2015




London, United Kingdom
#10New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:37:03
I was taught it alongside natural selection in science lessons. I saw no problem with that as it was just another theory about the existence of the universe. I can see why some may feel that it's wrong to put something that is not empirically known to be true in a science lesson though.

I'm not too sure really.
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#11New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:40:09
@sister_of_mercy Said

I was taught it alongside natural selection in science lessons. I saw no problem with that as it was just another theory about the existence of the universe. I can see why some may feel that it's wrong to put something that is not empirically known to be true in a science lesson though.

I'm not too sure really.



The thing is that evolution by natural selection is, firstly, not he only theory about natural history that contradicts the Bible, and secondly, it is verified by empirical evidence whereas creationism is not. They are both theories, but that doesn't mean they automatically have equal worth.
sister_of_mercy On March 11, 2015




London, United Kingdom
#12New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:42:46
@buffalobill90 Said

The thing is that evolution by natural selection is, firstly, not he only theory about natural history that contradicts the Bible, and secondly, it is verified by empirical evidence whereas creationism is not. They are both theories, but that doesn't mean they automatically have equal worth.



Yeah that's true, but it was easy to be able to make judgements about the theories if you were taught them side by side. As long as the teacher never says that there is any scientific truth to creationism, I don't see the problem. Although perhaps both may be better off taught in an RE lesson, I don't know. But I do think that there isn't anything necessarily wrong with teaching both ideas side by side so you can see clearly and make your own judgement.
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#13New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:46:14
@sister_of_mercy Said

Yeah that's true, but it was easy to be able to make judgements about the theories if you were taught them side by side. As long as the teacher never says that there is any scientific truth to creationism, I don't see the problem. Although perhaps both may be better off taught in an RE lesson, I don't know. But I do think that there isn't anything necessarily wrong with teaching both ideas side by side so you can see clearly and make your own judgement.



Would you object to the teaching of the Sumerian creation story in science classes? The cosmic battle between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu?
jmo On April 29, 2021
Beruset af Julebryg





Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#14New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:47:13
@sister_of_mercy Said

I was taught it alongside natural selection in science lessons. I saw no problem with that as it was just another theory about the existence of the universe. I can see why some may feel that it's wrong to put something that is not empirically known to be true in a science lesson though.

I'm not too sure really.



Wait, you were genuinely taught creationism as a scientific theory? Like seriously?

Creationism isn't a scientific theory, it is a story, I didn't know they actually taught kids in science creationism as a possibility. We were only taught it in RMPS at my school, and even in that we were taught that even from a Christian perspective it was wrong.
sister_of_mercy On March 11, 2015




London, United Kingdom
#15New Post! Jan 31, 2010 @ 14:52:32
@buffalobill90 Said

Would you object to the teaching of the Sumerian creation story in science classes? The cosmic battle between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu?



Well maybe not in science classes on but RS then by all means. I think the Christian creation story is only in science lessons over here because the UK is still a predominantly Christian country (more or less) and some teachers might not want to tell them any one thing is true for fear of children or parents becoming offended. I think if it were to be gone over very briefly in a science lesson then that's fine to compare it with natural selection.big bang/whatever, but to go in depth on any of the religious aspects it would be more preferential to cover it in RS.

I didn't really think it would be that much of an issue really.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2 3 4 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Be Respectful of Others

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Religion & Philosophy
Fri Nov 04, 2011 @ 11:19
199 12810
New posts   Religion & Philosophy
Mon Nov 01, 2010 @ 04:36
126 5401
New posts   Religion & Philosophy
Mon Dec 14, 2009 @ 21:09
241 8539
New posts   Religion & Philosophy
Mon Oct 20, 2008 @ 17:15
19 898
New posts   Religion & Philosophy
Fri Feb 15, 2008 @ 02:34
16 962