@jmo Said That doesnt really answer my question...i mean the all the evidence show that it's an ongoing thing (like the fact that the universe is red shows it's expanding and all that boring crap they teach in physics).
Im more concerned with people's beliefs concerning it than the actualy facts. Perhaps this should be posted in the philosophy section.
Forgive me, I was trying to interject some reality of what the Big Bang is before people started talking about it.
We basically "know" what the universe was like starting with a few seconds after the Big Bang. We don't really "know" what it was like before that. We only have guesses like the Big Bang. We don't really know why matter is distributed the way it is, or why background radiation is so uniform when the matter distribution is not, etc. The "starting parameters" of the universe are largely unknown, and that's apparently what we're really trying to figure out at the moment.
I'm not sure you can argue with the apparent fact that there was a "big bang" of sorts, but we can argue indefinitely about whether the universe started as an actual singularity, whether it will return to one, etc.
I personally think we're a long way away from knowing what happens to the laws of physics when approaching a singularity.
I'm not sure what you mean by "beliefs" concerning the theory.