I think I'm pretty ignorant regarding all the various "feminisms" listed in the OP, all I've ever read in any sort of detail have been "feminist" theologians seeking to right the perceived wrongs of the Patriarchal Christian Church (plus another on "post patriarchal Buddhism" by Rita Gross) and I certainly had much sympathy for most of the views expressed, and agreement with most of the historical judgements made.
On the wider front, it seems incredible now to think that women did not even have the right to vote in the UK less than 100 years ago. And it seems obvious to me that, generally speaking, civilisation has suffered because of what could be called male domination in terms of the various "expressions of power" throughout history. But really, that's more something I would need to gen up on to have a genuine argument.
One thing I would say is that I usually feel sorrow for those women who, by observation of their lives and actions, seem to think that aping the age old stupidities of men - now they have the freedom and opportunity to do so - constitutes some sort of liberation. They merely exchange one set of chains for a another - at least to my eyes.
Obviously, men and women ARE different, and any genuine liberation would involve being true to ones own potential. This for men as well as women. I suppose its a case of knowing exactly what those potentials are, beyond social norms imposed by mere convention.
Anyway, "the wife" is calling, must have forgotten the washing up.......