@chaski Said
Which part... my sarcasm that the bible is 100% correct, my sarcasm that there are no contradictions in the bible, or the part about faith going to hell?
Or....?
Youo may be sarcastic about there being no contradictions in the bible, but as I have demnstrated more than once on here there simply aren't any. There are misunderstandings and occasional reporting differences, but no actual contradictions. We have even had a whole thread on here which others put forward things they felt were contradictions, but no-one found one I couldn't explain yet. Maybe you can? but somehow I doubt it veruy much. I would be grateful if you would try though.
The problem is that where people find what appears to be a contradiction, they are simply finding that because they have misunderstood the meaning of one or more of the scriptures which appear to contradict.
Straighten out the meanings and you lose the contradiction. That is a large part of the key to understanding the bible, not just assuming that because some say there are contradictions they are right.
Can you prove anything in the bible wrong? I couldn't? Nor can anyone else. History proves everything that we have evidence about to be correct. Archaeology backs that up. The only evidence that has been assumed to prove evolution actually supports creation far more accurately. There is not one piece of scientific evidence that pproves the bile wrong, though there is not a lot that proves it right either. The nearest thing that could be said to do that is where the bible describes the "circle of the earth", which appears to indicate a flat earth, but since Hebrew had no word for sphere, the Hebrew word there translated as circle also applies to spheres so who knows which they meant, certainly no one can prove it either way, unless you assume an ignorance which denies the knowledge of the one inspiring the bible.
No, the bible is 100% true, provided you take the wording to mean what it actually does mean, not one of the alternative, and sometimes more obvious, meanings. To rehash the old chestnut, for instance, as long as you realise that day doesn't always mean 24 hours, just as it doesn't in today's usage.
True that sometimes means you have to sort things out, but that is not all that difficult if approached with a desire to know which possible meaning is really true.
As I said, please feel free to point out any "contradictions" I am sure that google can lead you to many that people clam come under that heading. I would be happy to straighten them out, again, as I have before. After all, I had to satisfy myself of that first so it's not the first time I have done it, by a long way.