Anti-science groups combining force- with an eye towards schools.

@someone_else Said

Home school's lookin better and better every day...

@someone_else Said

Home school's lookin better and better every day...

@shinobinoz Said

Depends. Wonder what the percentage of home schooled get evolution (which is fact not theory- you can argue about how evolution has created new species and what comes next in line- which are theories but the science behind species adaptation and evolution is solidly fact) or get creationism.

@someone_else Said

I'd say that most get creation with evolution of species after the fact. Instead of 'evolution as origin'. Creation and evolution don't cancel each other out completely.

@shinobinoz Said

God created evolution ennit?

@someone_else Said

ennit....is that an English/American word? I see you say it all the time but I don't know what it means.

I didn't have time to explain yesterday, so I'll do that now.

I, personally believe that things were created and then 'adapted'. The adaption process is evolution and I'm not denying that. However, I don't think that one animal changed into something different (i.e. dinosaurs into birds). Every living thing is made out of roughly the same 'stuff' (I'm not a scientist so I'm not sure what to call it) just in different patterns. Yes, people are going to find that they're similar, but not the same.

Let's use dogs for an example. Dogs are dogs. They are not cats or bears, etc. There are a multitude of dog breeds but they are all the same species. They have been 'bred' into differnt dogs, but they are all dogs .

I hope that explained...It's kinda early for me and I have a short attention span anyway...

@shinobinoz Said

Ennit is really just spoken. Some First Nations use like "right?" "no?"

Dinosaurs most likely did turn into birds. The reptilian evidence in Aves is just too strong.

Dogs are dogs are coyotes are wolves are dingos are....see where this is headed?

@someone_else Said

I do see where you're headed. The dinosaur/bird thing is largely debatable so lets stick with dogs.

My point was that all those things are still dogs. They are not something inherently different, like fish or cats or horses. Dogs did not become horses did they? The evolution occurs within a species but I don't see any evidence of it crossing species.

@Rec Said

There are no transitory specimens, evolution is a viable theory within the species only> Anything else is just a theory.

@someone_else Said

Is that what I said?

@Rec Said

If we live in a rational world and there is no way to observe the beginning of life, nor any record of it, then we start from now and work backwards until the records end. There is no ape to man, bird from dinasour, dog to horse, only in a scientific supposition that is not proof only conjecture from givens that are scanty and sparse.


As for the DNA etc. etc. that speaks only to the organic makeup of life not to the distinctions in the intangible parts or the knowledge of the same. A human or animal makeup is more than just DNA and cells,,,,,the whole has to be regarded, and the parts as part of the whole, or it becomes irrational or partial knowledge.
There is more to tangible and intangible than man can dream! JMO