@Kristy69 Said
I thought about this a while ago, and to me, it kinda makes sense.
Nature creates diseases in order to enable natural selections.
The species or the strongest of the species stay alive if the diversity is great enough and they can have somewhat of an immunity to the disease and survive it.
Those who don't die out and there you go.
Natural selection is for population control, weeding out bad genes, and giving an upper hand to stronger species (the circle of life/food chain).
Do you think nature has developed AIDS, cancer and other uncurable diseases in order to attempt to control the human population since it's grown so?
This can be taken in a religious way (like God' will or w/e) or this can just be a creationism idea.
Or both.
I just want your opinion.
it is how we got here.
why shouldn't nature still control us