The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

90% of American Indians Not Offended by "Redskins"

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: 1 2 3 4 · >>
Crush On June 23, 2021




,
#1New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 08:56:34
Cite

So, seems 90% of American Indians are too busy living productive lives to b**** endlessly about what a football team is called.

Of course, there's been much commentary since the poll came out as to why the poll shouldn't count. Everybody loves democracy until the majority of people disagree with them.
white_swan53 On October 07, 2020




n/a, New Mexico
#2New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 09:35:03
Quote:

COX: I think that's a stretch. We didn't ask people if they supported the name. Certainly in our anecdotal follow-up interviews, there were people who said they felt honored. Some people said that native imagery in sports at least represented them in some ways in a society where they often felt overlooked. But that was all anecdotal. I think to say that Native Americans support the name - that's not something, certainly, that our poll asked or found.



from the cite in the OP .
white_swan53 On October 07, 2020




n/a, New Mexico
#3New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 10:16:44
@Crush Said

Cite

So, seems 90% of American Indians are too busy living productive lives to b**** endlessly about what a football team is called.

Of course, there's been much commentary since the poll came out as to why the poll shouldn't count. Everybody loves democracy until the majority of people disagree with them.



That's just it you see the numbers don't work , it's not the majority of Native Americans disagreeing with those fighting to get the sports teams to change their names.
Native Americans are less than 1% of the population, so to randomly have gotten 509 native Americans, the Social Science Research Solutions would have had to randomly poll over 50,000 people . That would be a huge sampling of people , wouldn't you say . Don't the companies doing these survey's usually call around 1500 people ?
Not to mention that the reporter in the interview cited in the OP says that the question of supporting the teams names ,was not something that the poll asked .

How the survey was conducted

The survey was conducted in conjunction with weekly national surveys of U.S. adults reached through a random sample of cellular and landline telephones conducted by Social Science Research Solutions of Media, Pa. Toward the end of a survey on a range of topics, respondents who identified their race as Native American were asked a series of questions on views of the Redskins team name and Native American imagery in sports.
a777pilot On July 14, 2022




, Texas
#4New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 16:02:07
I don't care if Indians are offended or not. I would opine that the owner of that team ought have the final decision as to what he wishes to call this team. The public then has the option of supporting that team or not. seems easy to me.
Crush On June 23, 2021




,
#5New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 22:35:03
Ah yes, the beauty of democracy. Had the poll found 90% of Native Americans were offended, it would be used as evidence that the name of the football team in Washington is a matter of great national import. There would be thunderous choruses a la Sophocles demanding that the name be changed NOW.

But since the poll found what it found, it doesn't count.
a777pilot On July 14, 2022




, Texas
#6New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 23:38:40
Even if there were poll that said 100% of indians were against the name, redskins, I would still say the name of a private organization is up to the owner and no one else's business.
boxer On June 16, 2016

Deleted
Banned



, Zimbabwe
#7New Post! May 23, 2016 @ 23:40:54
Oh, look....


Yet another racism thread.



yawn.
white_swan53 On October 07, 2020




n/a, New Mexico
#8New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 00:52:46
Oh look, it's the guy who has started a whole three threads in 2016. .
Crush On June 23, 2021




,
#9New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 00:53:59
@boxer Said

Oh, look....


Yet another racism thread.



yawn.



You're such a caustic wit.
boxer On June 16, 2016

Deleted
Banned



, Zimbabwe
#10New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 00:56:12
Oh look, it's a stupid redneck c*** and her tag along troll!
Crush On June 23, 2021




,
#11New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 00:59:29
@boxer Said

Oh look, it's a stupid redneck c*** and her tag along troll!



You sure showed her. Stay classy champ.
boxer On June 16, 2016

Deleted
Banned



, Zimbabwe
#12New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 01:11:04
@Crush Said

You sure showed her. Stay classy champ.



I'm starting to think you have a "crush" on me.
Crush On June 23, 2021




,
#13New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 01:21:37
@boxer Said

I'm starting to think you have a "crush" on me.



Well, you are very effeminate. Who knows, this could be the start of something.
boxer On June 16, 2016

Deleted
Banned



, Zimbabwe
#14New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 01:24:18
@Crush Said

Well, you are very effeminate. Who knows, this could be the start of something.


You're right... I am. But, like I said in the other threads where you're flirting with me, I'm a happily married man.
white_swan53 On October 07, 2020




n/a, New Mexico
#15New Post! May 24, 2016 @ 02:21:11
boxer you have two styles of posting ,
1, a drunken fish wife
2, menopausal grandma on horse piss hormone pills

your back on my block list
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: 1 2 3 4 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   News & Current Events
Wed Oct 26, 2011 @ 17:01
0 457
New posts   Racism
Tue Jun 14, 2016 @ 00:41
405 17583
New posts   Television
Mon Jan 21, 2013 @ 22:31
25 9105
New posts   Politics
Mon Nov 14, 2011 @ 05:51
7 952
New posts   Politics
Sun Jul 01, 2012 @ 16:05
0 456