@LuckyCharms Said
They handled it wrong to be sure. They were overzealous and there's going to be some repercussions I'm sure.
But no there shouldn't be fall back at the school. Schools are there to teach. Parents are there to parent. You have parents that should not be parents and expect the schools to pick up the slack for their ineptitude. These people shouldn't be having kids. They should have had abortions.
People think I'm harsh with this s*** and I am. But you've got people that shouldn't have kids expecting the system to cover for their mistakes and another group wanting to take away the solution.
But the reality is that as long as we have these two forces in play, yeah you're gonna get some dumbass crazy people going over the line and over-reacting. And the state/county etc (read taxpayers) are going to have to pay out damages for these mistakes.
Too many dumbf***s breeding. It brings us down to the lowest common denominator.
I don't know that there shouldn't be fallback from the school. I mean, if the parents don't care and the school doesn't care, what hope do these kids have? I agree that it's bulls***, but at the same time are we to hang these kids all out to dry because of it?
I think they should have conferenced and communicated with the parents initially though. If that fails, then you move on to something more extreme or accept that as a teacher you can't parent them, however you feel about it.
You could tell the parents about it though; you don't have to ignore it to avoid overstepping your bounds as a teacher.
@DorkySupergirl Said
Sorry let me rephrase because when I think of the word gun, I think of a hand gun that people have to collect or for protection. That is very rare in my country. In my area, in the country parts, most people have hunting rifles because hunting is very popular here. But even those who have hunting rifles, their kids are not allowed to handle them, touch them etc. I would say about the age 16 or older, the father will start to allow his son to handle the hunting rifle. Maybe that is different in other parts of Canada but here kids do not go around or touch the hunting rifles.
I guess I don't really think of hand guns either. But the word 'gun', whatever the size, just doesn't lead to that kind of reaction for me. In my american view, they jumped too harshly on this, unless there were reasons more than a picture to lead them to call in social services without so much as a conference first.
Here, it generally begins much younger. I'm still trying to decide on this right now; at this point I'm settling somewhere around 10 to actually go off with his uncle, which is actually going to be a fight because he's going to hear about the other kids who want to go starting younger.