@Conflict Said
I quite agree. Police base their interpretation of right and wrong strictly on ethics, not on morality.
eth·ics (ˈeTHiks)
noun
plural noun: ethics; noun: ethics
1.
moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.
"Judeo-Christian ethics"
synonyms:
moral code, morals, morality, values, rights and wrongs, principles, ideals, standards (of behavior), value system, virtues, dictates of conscience More
the
moral correctness of specified conduct.
"the ethics of euthanasia"
2.
the branch of knowledge that deals with
moral principles.
_________________________________________
Ethics
is morality.
@Conflict Said
Rules and regulations and the secular idea of conduct, are their purview.
This is also what quite a lot of people consider to be morality.
@Conflict Said
If I wanted help, I would talk to a friend, I certainly wouldn't ask you. Your view is much more human than mine. I believe more in animal principle, separate from human civilization, because we are still mammals. We may be more subtle, but we are still wolves in sheep´s clothing and only lobotomies or torture can change that for good.
My view is more "human." Hm. I thought we were talking about humans.
Anyway, you seem to have a limited view of what a human being is. And by posting your questions you are, in essence, asking anyone who answers for help. However, you ask for answers but seem to not want to listen to them if they don't look favorably on what you believe. When was the last time you admitted to being wrong about something? Being wrong is also something that is very human and there is no shame in it.
@Conflict Said
As for your latest feedback, we're ultimately the ones to decide what to do with our lives and with other people. We make decisions that affect them and us. No one forces our hand. It's our will to power that makes life work or doesn't. A police officer fights for what he believes in, no one asked him to join the police force, he joined it of his own free will, so he cast the die, with his own hand. His self-interest motivated him to take his job. He could have just as easily chosen something else to do.
You contradict yourself. What "making decisions affecting our lives" is an ingredient of is
humanity, which is what actually does separate us from other animals. And your question wasn't "what prompted a police officer to choose his profession," it was basically "what is the difference between a police officer pointing a gun at someone and a criminal pointing a gun at someone" and I only can really repeat my answer, that it is the motivation behind the act that differentiates the two. I could just as easily ask you what motivates a criminal to become a criminal, and the answer varies just as it does for police officers.
You can't just change the question if you don't like the answer I give, but my answer is not actually an opinion. It is a fact that one of the large differences between a police officer pointing a weapon and a criminal pointing a weapon is motivation.
Do you disagree? Imagine an officer stepping into the line of fire and drawing his weapon against a criminal who is trying to shoot someone else that the officer has never even met, but that the criminal is trying to rob and kill. Is the difference more clear? One is protective, the other is acquisitive of something the criminal has done nothing to earn.