The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Religion & Philosophy

Liberalism, atheism linked to higher IQ

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sweet_Merry On October 01, 2023
One day. . . I will





Building my Castles in the Sky
#76New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 13:57:29
@boxerdc Said

They discredited his past work. This has not been discredited yet.

I actually find it enlightening that a piece that I posted here because I thought it was funny, and wondered if it would get a rise out of our "crazy" christians, actually got such a rise out of you. I suspect that you're not as sure of everything as you seem.

Or perhaps you're just a little under the weather?



but you are so determined to stand behind it and yet now you say you just wanted a rise out of people?

I knew you made me laugh for a reason.
Patt On May 05, 2010
NOT a Mafia Don


Deleted
Banned



Home,
#77New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 13:58:19
@boxerdc Said

They discredited his past work. This has not been discredited yet.

I actually find it enlightening that a piece that I posted here because I thought it was funny, and wondered if it would get a rise out of our "crazy" christians, actually got such a rise out of you. I suspect that you're not as sure of everything as you seem.

Or perhaps you're just a little under the weather?


Based on the past reception of his conclusions, I think the operative word here is 'yet'.

It didn't get a rise out of me. I just wanted to present his past work and it's reception by his peer group. I've done that and obviously you don't like it.

Yeah, my nose is a bit stuffy - but that's probably because it's raining this morning.
boxerdc On December 18, 2012

Deleted



,
#78New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:01:33
@Sweet_Merry Said

but you are so determined to stand behind it and yet now you say you just wanted a rise out of people?

I knew you made me laugh for a reason.


Where did I stand behind it?
All I did was toss the bait, and reel it back in to see what was on the hook. And while the data is statistically significant, it holds no such significance in the real world, so it doesn't matter.

It's like discussing why frogs don't have wings. It's entertaining, and you're bound to get some kook who will insist that at some point that they did, or an even bigger kook who will spend paragraphs explaining the scientific reasons why a frog wouldn't need them.
Patt On May 05, 2010
NOT a Mafia Don


Deleted
Banned



Home,
#79New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:02:47
Why the need to bait - that's odd, don't you think?
Sweet_Merry On October 01, 2023
One day. . . I will





Building my Castles in the Sky
#80New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:03:00
@boxerdc Said

Where did I stand behind it?
All I did was toss the bait, and reel it back in to see what was on the hook. And while the data is statistically significant, it holds no such significance in the real world, so it doesn't matter.

It's like discussing why frogs don't have wings. It's entertaining, and you're bound to get some kook who will insist that at some point that they did, or an even bigger kook who will spend paragraphs explaining the scientific reasons why a frog wouldn't need them.



Can I have wings first?
boxerdc On December 18, 2012

Deleted



,
#81New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:06:42
@Patt Said

Why the need to bait - that's odd, don't you think?


Honey... Have you seen most of my posts?
buffalobill90 On July 12, 2013
Powered by tea





Viaticum, United Kingdom
#82New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:21:20
@Patt Said

I don't have to, if you read the link, the scientific community already did it for me. Don't be upset because you're not as special as you wanted to believe you are. LOL



Sorry, could you point that out? Is it in one of the comments? EDIT: my bad, you meant the Guardian article. Still, that's a past study, not the current one. You're still just making an ad hominem attack.

Perhaps you don't realise that they are using an operational definition of 'liberal' which probably isn't what you would associate the word with. The researchers themselves profess to be conservative and libertarian in the conventional sense.

@Patt Said

But, if you think eugenics are the way to go - I'd say you'd have several here that might dispute that - and loudly too.



What are you talking about? Where did I voice support for eugenics?
boxerdc On December 18, 2012

Deleted



,
#83New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:31:25
@Patt Said

Why the need to bait - that's odd, don't you think?


It's what I do.. I do think it's odd that you went for it. Just proves P.T. Barnums old adage.
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#84New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:34:07
@boxerdc Said
Just proves P.T. Barnums old adage.


Oh yeah? Want to tell us which adage that is?

Of course not, because you don't want to call Patt a "sucker" in the forums. Though it's obvious you just did.

Oh by the way, PT Barnum never said what you think he said.
Patt On May 05, 2010
NOT a Mafia Don


Deleted
Banned



Home,
#85New Post! Mar 02, 2010 @ 14:52:31
@boxerdc Said

Honey... Have you seen most of my posts?


Nope - I've only been here shy of a month or so now. LOL

I didn't know you post up things just to reel people in to see if you can yank a chain or two. Forgive me for taking you more seriously than I should have, huh?

You learn something new every day. Also an adage. 8)
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Be Respectful of Others

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Jokes & Humor
Sun Jan 23, 2011 @ 01:11
3 763
New posts   TFS+
Thu Oct 22, 2009 @ 16:03
10 1349
New posts   Random
Sat Oct 03, 2009 @ 00:27
0 359
New posts   Writing
Mon Jul 27, 2009 @ 18:04
1 674
New posts   Random
Tue Jun 20, 2006 @ 16:46
117 4939