Evolution and Cell Theory

@sirkewl Said

Notice how a university says that spontaneous generation of cells do not occur, so cells just don't happen because millions of years made them to be replicating cells.

@sirkewl Said
And that is one of the reasons why belief in God will never disappear, and why people will always disagree with each other on the genesis of life, because nobody has every produced a fully functional cell through non-biological atoms in a lab

@sirkewl Said

I have a question just for Atheists.

Atheists, you say that science is on your side, because you can't observe God, and the theory that the first cell(s) were formed after millions of years of random occurance that allowed DNA to form, ect, ect, ect.

You see, I want to shed my belief in God, because I love living in truth. I want to understand the truth of everything as much as my mind can allow. But the thing is, how can the first cell just happen if all cells come from pre-existing cells - which is one of the laws of cell theory.



Notice how a university says that spontaneous generation of cells do not occur, so cells just don't happen because millions of years made them to be replicating cells.

So the question now is, how did the first cell on earth happen, or if you e.t. believers out there, how did the first cell in the universe happen?

If all cells come from pre-existing cells, the first cell can be no different. The first cell ever to form has to be made by another living entity made up of cells, or it violates cell theory.

How can this be, since there were no cells in time before the first cell. Here's where we get into quantom physics, and the nature of the Big Bang. We know from the Big Bang Theory that the universe was created by an uncaused cause that exists outside of space-time.

So, the uncaused cause of the Big Bang must also be the uncaused cause of the first cell as well, as no cell in the universe can be created from spontaneous generation, but through pre-existing cells. Therefore the uncaused cause of the Big Bang is also a living entity, and therefore we can say, it is not a thing, but a person, a living entity.

So, at least I can sit back and say, well my idea that there is a God (a living creature) that created life, my theory doesn't violate cell theory.

However, the idea that life can from spontaneously from non-organic matter does, as cells don't spontaneously occur, and all cells come from pre-existing cells. . . Next thing I'm going to hear from you guys is that the world and life was created in fire or ice or numerous other non-scientific things!

@Luuccyy Said

You say that a God may have created the first cells, but I see a major flaw in this theory.
You implicate God is a living creature, but all living creatures require cells; having cells is pretty much what defines a living being.

I think that the most logical explaination is there is none; or, at least, not yet. Or, perhaps there never be one; perhaps the cause of the universe is simply something oustside the realms of human comprehention.