The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Obama Administration Affirms Bush Policy on Detainee Rights

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
raditz8526 On July 02, 2009

Deleted



, Minnesota
#1New Post! Feb 21, 2009 @ 03:52:02
Obama Administration Affirms Bush Policy on Detainee Rights
Justice Department lawyers filed court papers agreeing that detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detentions

AP

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's Justice Department sided with the former Bush administration on Friday, saying detainees in Afghanistan have no constitutional rights.

In a two-sentence court filing, department lawyers said the Obama administration agreed that detainees at Bagram Air Base cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detentions. The filing shocked human rights attorneys.

"The hope we all had in President Obama to lead us on a different path has not turned out as we'd hoped," said Tina Monshipour Foster, a human rights attorney representing a detainee at the Bagram Air Base. "We all expected better."

In midyear last year, the Supreme Court gave al-Qaida and Taliban suspects held at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention. With about 600 detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan and thousands more held in Iraq, courts are grappling with whether they, too, can sue to be released.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/20/obama-administration-affirms-bush-policy-detainee-rights/

Something else Obama has done right.
JuanSmith On September 11, 2020
Shilsh-Aash yatasay





Near Eucalyptus Trees, Califor
#2New Post! Feb 21, 2009 @ 04:27:26
"The hope we all had in President Obama to lead us on a different path has not turned out as we'd hoped," said Tina Monshipour Foster, a human rights attorney representing a detainee at the Bagram Air Base. "We all expected better."

so basically these peoples wanted to afford Terrorists the same rights as normal uniformed combatants?

i know the whole issue of their rights came because of the leaked photos and what not. BUT! do these people actually want to give a terrorist who has no intention of following Geneva codes some rights?

yes we should hold ourselves to higher standards.. but these are terrorists. who will kill regardless of any circumstance ... Personally I don't think they should have rights at all.
as far as the detained peeps with possible or suspected ties... well... sucks to be them...
sunandsurf13 On June 29, 2009

Deleted



Sydney, Australia
#3New Post! Feb 21, 2009 @ 05:14:12
@raditz8526 Said

Obama Administration Affirms Bush Policy on Detainee Rights
Justice Department lawyers filed court papers agreeing that detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detentions

AP

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's Justice Department sided with the former Bush administration on Friday, saying detainees in Afghanistan have no constitutional rights.

In a two-sentence court filing, department lawyers said the Obama administration agreed that detainees at Bagram Air Base cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detentions. The filing shocked human rights attorneys.

"The hope we all had in President Obama to lead us on a different path has not turned out as we'd hoped," said Tina Monshipour Foster, a human rights attorney representing a detainee at the Bagram Air Base. "We all expected better."

In midyear last year, the Supreme Court gave al-Qaida and Taliban suspects held at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention. With about 600 detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan and thousands more held in Iraq, courts are grappling with whether they, too, can sue to be released.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/20/obama-administration-affirms-bush-policy-detainee-rights/

Something else Obama has done right.



I understand Guanatemo Bay is to be closed under the Obama administration. I'm unsure what is so different about this place....it seems like the same atrocities that happened in GB happen at Bagram also.
Bizarre.

https://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/b/bagram_air_base_afghanistan/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Politics
Wed May 16, 2012 @ 03:17
90 5966
New posts   Politics
Tue Jan 20, 2009 @ 22:15
31 1363
New posts   Politics
Sun Sep 07, 2008 @ 17:05
46 2451
New posts   Religion
Sun Jul 06, 2008 @ 15:38
1 934
New posts   Animal Rights
Fri Mar 21, 2008 @ 16:22
3 1516