The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Right Wing....Left Wing...

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...6 7 8
sophie On November 16, 2008




Santa Monica, California
#106New Post! Aug 12, 2008 @ 20:50:19
@britneylulu Said
Environmental rules are another way in which Democrats make life worse for poor people. Malaria is almost nonexistent in the United States, but it is a big killer world wide. Even when it doesn?t kill people it makes them unable to plant or harvest. Controlling malaria involves controlling mosquitoes. DDT was a cost effective way to control mosquitoes, but because of the hysteria about what it appeared to be doing to birds in California in the 1960?s, DDT has been banned world wide. Some thoughtful environmentalists will admit privately that there was never enough scientific evidence for DDT to be completely banned, and they realized that it could be used to save millions of lives and to insure that people could be fit for work during planting and harvest. However, this will never happen with Democrats in power because of wacko environmentalists in the Democratic Party.


DDT is a dead dangerous product and wasnt forbidden cause soem birds died in CA, but because humans died of it!
It is lethal.
It also poison th eblood, can cause cancer and affect the DNA causing genetical deseases.
Anmd birth of difformed kids.
It also poison the soils, comes into the plant that are harvested where it has been used DDT, and come into your organism via your table and what you eat and drink cause it alos come into the water and polluate it intensivly..
It also provocate allergy and astma and decrease the number of pspermatozoids in male seeds and affect the women genitals.
And thats why it was forbidden, so do some research before talking. You obviously know nohing of what you are tlaking about but have been seriously brain washed..
What you say sounds more like propaganda than knowledge of facts.
DDT wasnt the alone dangerosu product used in the american fields so the american population ingested a loads of s*** for 2 generations.
Many of the actual diseases and new diseases comes form this, inclding the fat epidemia.
Many plastic products and profucts to do the wash up contained dangerous molecular connectins who affect the production of fat cells, and once in the body they dont regress, meaning that a child exposed to those kind of stuff for some years will have all thsoe fat cells in his body and will eventually become fat.
Recent research and discovery have unveiled this.
It is not just alimentation and lack of motion, it is simply a desease of the prouction of fat cells ion the body, as empty cells, who will have to get fill with fat.
Why do you think that birds died cause of DDT?
They werent injected it..
they drink the water..
and they ate the corns who contained DDT.
The alone reason why not so many humans died of food poisoning with DDT, is that we are bigger than birds and eat other things than corns.. but cow ate corns..and chickens to, and we ate them so the chain was big and this vicious circle had to be broken.
It also damaged palnts and soil and it was even worse in third countries.They didnt stoped it because the american governement forbidden it. They could dont give a s*** about it. But because of what happened to them becasue of DDT. It had been in use for over 20 years before it was forbidden, worse for soem of those countries.
And it was also produced in paces like india, so its thsoe people, who produced it ands who worked there who get killed by it as well.

If you vote and judge politic out of what you know, and if what you know is so full of stupidities and ignorance as oyu just have show, then dont oyu think you should rethink the whole picture you got of the world and of american interests and policies, before going to vote?
You are basing your opinion and decision on a lac of knowledge and on misinformation.
Youa re certainly not the alone one to do that, but is that a reason to keep being ignorant. Its not like you were living in China and couldnt access real data, is it?
Then do some homework. You will thank yourself for having done so later on.
foxytrot On February 04, 2015
Turtle Ninja





Oceanside, California
#107New Post! Aug 12, 2008 @ 20:53:15
@sophie Said
DDT is a dead dangerous product and wasnt forbidden cause soem birds died in CA, but because humans died of it!
It is lethal.
It also poison th eblood, can cause cancer and affect the DNA causing genetical deseases.
Anmd birth of difformed kids.
It also poison the soils, comes into the plant that are harvested where it has been used DDT, and come into your organism via your table and what you eat and drink cause it alos come into the water and polluate it intensivly..
It also provocate allergy and astma and decrease the number of pspermatozoids in male seeds and affect the women genitals.
And thats why it was forbidden, so do some research before talking. You obviously know nohing of what you are tlaking about but have been seriously brain washed..
What you say sounds more like propaganda than knowledge of facts.
DDT wasnt the alone dangerosu product used in the american fields so the american population ingested a loads of s*** for 2 generations.
Many of the actual diseases and new diseases comes form this, inclding the fat epidemia.
Many plastic products and profucts to do the wash up contained dangerous molecular connectins who affect the production of fat cells, and once in the body they dont regress, meaning that a child exposed to those kind of stuff for some years will have all thsoe fat cells in his body and will eventually become fat.
Recent research and discovery have unveiled this.
It is not just alimentation and lack of motion, it is simply a desease of the prouction of fat cells ion the body, as empty cells, who will have to get fill with fat.
Why do you think that birds died cause of DDT?
They werent injected it..
they drink the water..
and they ate the corns who contained DDT.
The alone reason why not so many humans died of food poisoning with DDT, is that we are bigger than birds and eat other things than corns.. but cow ate corns..and chickens to, and we ate them so the chain was big and this vicious circle had to be broken.
It also damaged palnts and soil and it was even worse in third countries.They didnt stoped it because the american governement forbidden it. They could dont give a s*** about it. But because of what happened to them becasue of DDT. It had been in use for over 20 years before it was forbidden, worse for soem of those countries.
And it was also produced in paces like india, so its thsoe people, who produced it ands who worked there who get killed by it as well.

If you vote and judge politic out of what you know, and if what you know is so full of stupidities and ignorance as oyu just have show, then dont oyu think you should rethink the whole picture you got of the world and of american interests and policies, before going to vote?
You are basing your opinion and decision on a lac of knowledge and on misinformation.
Youa re certainly not the alone one to do that, but is that a reason to keep being ignorant. Its not like you were living in China and couldnt access real data, is it?
Then do some homework. You will thank yourself for having done so later on.



Miss Sophie,

I swear! I think if you put all your posts together you would have a novel!
sAeGeSpAeNe On October 05, 2021
Part-time Nidologist





The other Bristol..., Connecti
#108New Post! Aug 12, 2008 @ 20:55:07
@noxus Said
... Is it the beginning of the end?


No, it's the signal to the populace to rise up, and form another political party to disrupt the stupidity being foisted upon us by our ass-hole representatives in Congress!
Scoobiedoolala On October 30, 2008

Deleted
Banned



paducah, Kentucky
#109New Post! Aug 12, 2008 @ 21:24:41
The left is currently advocating a socialist government. Take from the haves and distribute to the havenots. This Robin Hood approach may seem noble on the surface. However, if people know they're going to live an average lifestyle regardless of effort, why struggle to be successful? Taxing the rich discourages investment causing people to lose jobs. The capital gains tax cuts, money made through investment, actually increased revenue for the government because it encouraged investment and created jobs for regular folks. Don't support seemingly great ideas without first investigating the overall consequence.
britneylulu On October 04, 2008

Deleted



Anaheim,
#110New Post! Aug 13, 2008 @ 02:03:18
@sophie Said
DDT is a dead dangerous product and wasnt forbidden cause soem birds died in CA, but because humans died of it!
It is lethal.
It also poison th eblood, can cause cancer and affect the DNA causing genetical deseases.
Anmd birth of difformed kids.
It also poison the soils, comes into the plant that are harvested where it has been used DDT, and come into your organism via your table and what you eat and drink cause it alos come into the water and polluate it intensivly..
It also provocate allergy and astma and decrease the number of pspermatozoids in male seeds and affect the women genitals.
And thats why it was forbidden, so do some research before talking. You obviously know nohing of what you are tlaking about but have been seriously brain washed..
What you say sounds more like propaganda than knowledge of facts.
DDT wasnt the alone dangerosu product used in the american fields so the american population ingested a loads of s*** for 2 generations.
Many of the actual diseases and new diseases comes form this, inclding the fat epidemia.
Many plastic products and profucts to do the wash up contained dangerous molecular connectins who affect the production of fat cells, and once in the body they dont regress, meaning that a child exposed to those kind of stuff for some years will have all thsoe fat cells in his body and will eventually become fat.
Recent research and discovery have unveiled this.
It is not just alimentation and lack of motion, it is simply a desease of the prouction of fat cells ion the body, as empty cells, who will have to get fill with fat.
Why do you think that birds died cause of DDT?
They werent injected it..
they drink the water..
and they ate the corns who contained DDT.
The alone reason why not so many humans died of food poisoning with DDT, is that we are bigger than birds and eat other things than corns.. but cow ate corns..and chickens to, and we ate them so the chain was big and this vicious circle had to be broken.
It also damaged palnts and soil and it was even worse in third countries.They didnt stoped it because the american governement forbidden it. They could dont give a s*** about it. But because of what happened to them becasue of DDT. It had been in use for over 20 years before it was forbidden, worse for soem of those countries.
And it was also produced in paces like india, so its thsoe people, who produced it ands who worked there who get killed by it as well.

If you vote and judge politic out of what you know, and if what you know is so full of stupidities and ignorance as oyu just have show, then dont oyu think you should rethink the whole picture you got of the world and of american interests and policies, before going to vote?
You are basing your opinion and decision on a lac of knowledge and on misinformation.
Youa re certainly not the alone one to do that, but is that a reason to keep being ignorant. Its not like you were living in China and couldnt access real data, is it?
Then do some homework. You will thank yourself for having done so later on.



DDT is not poisonous to humans. It might not be good for fish and birds if used in large quantities. DDT damaged birds in California, not because of the use of DDT, but because the factory that manufactured DDT was in Los Angeles. The factory belched DDT into the ocean along with sewage from Los Angeles. DDT may have caused eggs of some birds to be too thin. That problem was solved by putting a filter on the factory's sewer.
britneylulu On October 04, 2008

Deleted



Anaheim,
#111New Post! Aug 13, 2008 @ 02:22:46
We suggested in an earlier post that Lyndon Johnson tried to eliminate poverty, but he made it worse. One might ask: Why did he think he could make it better?

Lyndon Johnson lived during a time with when Federal Government, could do no wrong. Actually it did many things wrong, but Johnson knew about so many things that it appeared to have done right, that he may have ignored the things that it did wrong.

Rural electrification must have been one of the things that to him formed a shining example of the rightness of government action. Life with electricity is easier than life without it. In 1900, cities had electricity, but rural areas didn't. During the Franklin Roosevelt administration, the Federal Government began a program of building electric power line in rural areas.

As a congressman, Lyndon Johnson represented the "hill country" of Texas. According to Johnson's biographer, water in the hill country came from deep wells. Women in the hill country had chronic back deformities because they had to draw water from deep wells. Rural electrification of the "hill country" eliminated the chronic back deformities because people could use electricity to draw water from wells, or at least so says the biographer.

With a stroke of the pen, President Roosevelt had eliminated a chronic health problem in the "hill country." This relationship between a government action and an unexpected improvement in public hearth must have been a thunderbolt in Johnson's view of the world. He may have thought that he could sign a law and poverty would disappear. Why didn't it?

We don't know, but do know that both before electrification and after electrification, women in the hill country had to draw their own water. Johnson did not give the women water, he only gave them a means to get the water. The women still had to have the initiative to buy pumps or electric motors to draw the water.

We think that the Great Society may have given people too much, so much that in the process it eliminated the initiative that is necessary for people to want to have a better life. The scary part is that Barak Obama wants to repeat the mistakes of the Great Society.
sAeGeSpAeNe On October 05, 2021
Part-time Nidologist





The other Bristol..., Connecti
#112New Post! Aug 13, 2008 @ 02:57:36
Diejenigen, die zu klug sind, sich in der Politik zu engagieren, werden dadurch bestraft, dass sie von Leuten regiert werden, die d?mmer sind als sie selbst.


Those who are too clever to engage in politics will be punished by being governed by people who are dumber than they themselves!

[So, now you know the whole story!]
noxus On October 18, 2009




Oroville, California
#113New Post! Aug 13, 2008 @ 03:18:30
@saegespaene Said
No, it's the signal to the populace to rise up, and form another political party to disrupt the stupidity being foisted upon us by our ass-hole representatives in Congress!


Don't forget WHO elected those A-holes, it was your fellow Americans. You have to decide if you want to abide by what your fellow citizens have chosen or if YOU know whats best for them. Are you up to that? Compromise can be a real b****.
bob_the_fisherman On January 30, 2023
Anatidaephobic





, Angola
#114New Post! Aug 15, 2008 @ 16:53:51
@spinkiegirl Said
Oh so my hope for change depends on me? You have great point about the presidential thing....but to me...it would seem, that if we ALL want the fullfillment of this country's promises...then why divide the people instend of working together for the common good...just have one govt. that serves ALL?


Sadly, as nice as this idea sounds, the idea of a government that serves all people is not really possible.

For example, in Australia at the moment, we have a group of 3 CEOs of our main telecommunications company (Telstra), earning $43,000,000 per year between them, and heading a company that made $3.7,000,000,000 profit last year, trying to destroy the union, and get their workers on individual contracts, with, of course, pay cuts, and a loss of terms and conditions. How is any government ever going to be able to serve the interest of greedy rich bastards on one hand, and workers on the other? It is not possible, as these two groups are in competition.

Sadly, the political reality of Australia, the USA and UK does not reflect this conflict anymore. There no longer exists a party that represents the interests of the workers - the left has been killed. Even though most people would support better health care, shorter work hours, better education, better roads etc., the mantra that we always hear in the media is about "wage pressure" leading to inflation, leading to job losses. Why? Because the corporate sector wants to be constantly increasing their profits year to year. They can only do that by either paying workers less for the work they do, or, charging people (workers), more for their goods and services.
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 ...6 7 8

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Food & Drink
Sun Oct 31, 2010 @ 16:25
6 566
New posts   Environment
Sun Oct 18, 2009 @ 11:18
45 3516
New posts   Society & Lifestyles
Sun May 18, 2008 @ 14:28
3 587
New posts   Law
Thu Mar 13, 2008 @ 18:04
50 4120
New posts   Video Games
Sun Jan 20, 2008 @ 01:46
4 799