@fitzyp Said
"Philosophers such as Antony Flew, Michael Martin, and William L. Rowe have contrasted strong (positive) atheism with weak (negative) atheism. Strong atheism is the explicit affirmation that gods do not exist. Weak atheism includes all other forms of non-theism. According to this categorization, anyone who is not a theist is either a weak or a strong atheist. The terms weak and strong are relatively recent, while the equivalent terms negative and positive atheism are of older origin, having been used (in slightly different ways) in the philosophical literature and in Catholic apologetics since at least 1813. Under this demarcation of atheism,
most agnostics qualify as weak atheists."
Wikipedia
Simply put agnosticism is a subset of atheism.
Who are the other ones?
So according to some people I'm irrefutably a weak atheist that dosn't profess true atheism (???) because I don't know, or believe, that God exists or not and don't know, or believe, that it's possible to know if he does or not. It certainly makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing I have this label and am now affiliated with people who claim they know God doesn't exist, to millions of people who misinterpret it's meaning, but please don't call me that in front of the children, I don't want to have to explain to them all this waffle and have them suffer the terrible trauma I just did from finding out I'm a weak atheist. I'll still not call myself that. It even sounds derogatory. They could have at least called it liberal atheism or half-arsed atheism.