outside meddling in democracy

Last year the deceptively named 'Hope Not Hate' campaign, run by the trade unions and the notoriously bigoted Searchlight organisation, spent over ?400,000 on a campaign of hate and lies designed to stop us winning seats in Europe. They failed, miserably.

My 'undercover' sources have been passing me information that this year they are learning from their mistakes and are planning something far greater in scale and deviousness, again designed to stop us making another breakthrough.

The collection of criminals, anti-white racists and bigots that make up Searchlight/Hope Not Hate, are a gang of twisted, hateful liar's hell bent on wrecking the future for all our children.

Once again, with the help of American cyber campaign experts Blue State Digital, Searchlight and the Far Left are planning an enormous anti-BNP campaign on a scale never seen before!. In their latest email newsletter, they boast of over 1,000 donations to a single fundraising appeal!

1. now my question is this, forget about this being an anti-bnp campaign for just one moment, should outsiders who themselves are not entering the political election process have the right to interfere, disrupt and try to influence the outcome by attacking legitimate political parties?

2. should this type of action be tolerated/accepted, and would it be if it was used to target other political parties?

3. Does the Bnp have the right to be allowed to contest the elections in the uk, in a fair manner without the meddling of extremist fringe opponents?

Is any of your post actual information, or is it all just opinion and bias?

Something of the sort is about to happen in the USA,the recent Supreme Court decision changing the status of corporations to those of individuals,has opened the door to foreign corporations to influence elections in the USA.

The outside meddling is a fact and is well publicised in many media forms including the tabloid sponsors of hope not hate, various websites and opposition publications.

The original questions posed were legitimate enough, should those not in the process be allowed to interfere in it, surely the decision of choice should be left to an individual to decide after reading all of the policies of those standing in the process, does an outside group/s have a right to try and bully, persuade and intimidate the electorate away from any particular party?

personally i feel that it is wrong, for anyone to interfere in any way with any parties campaign, stand against at the ballot box yes, smear leaflets, marches and intimidation at polling booths a definate no.

I don't much like the anti-fascist campaign groups around at the moment, but I like the BNP much less. In fact, I like the BNP less than I like vomit.

It's quite rich to hear all this coming from someone whose party uses disciplinary tribunals and proscription to ensure that all of its members are ideologically loyal to its Chairman and his appointed advisers, and none of them are allowed to associate with people that the leadership deems to be poisonous to the party's interests.

That no one should be allowed to campaign against political parties in the UK is a proposition I would only expect to come from an aspiring fascist group like the BNP.

thanks bill prompt reply as usual;

https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/

Trust me, Hope Not Hate and UAF are a lot better than the groups they're campaigning against.

mmm... yes suppose the 60 Uaf arrests yesterday in bolton were just a blip!

They are violent thugs with an openly marxist agenda, they use the anti-racism as a front to simply try to appear to be something that they are not.

Better than the guys making the "rivers of blood" speeches the majority of whom don't know squat about what their party stands for.

At least no UAF members have been charged with terrorism or conspiracy to commit terrorist acts.

What I don't understand is the propaganda that the latest Euro elections were a success for the BNP and that campaigns against the fascist organisation have failed considering they actually lost votes compared to the previous election.

i see another silly thread, i will abstain from commenting.