A 17 yr old girl was gang-raped, bashed repeatedly, and threatened with a knife. Despite her attacker pleading guilty and is now in jail, he still maintains the vicious attack wasn't his fault and that he shouldn't be locked up.
The reason?
He was off his head on Ice at the time and therefore argued that he shouldn't be held reponsible for the crime.
In 2004 Canan, now 28, returned home to his flat in Sydney. He was high on crystal meth (ice), which he'd used regularly for six months. Canan's report said that he was probably feeling some of the effects of the drug such as: hyperactivity, irritability, plus an increase in confidence, strength and libido.
Not long after returning, he made sexual advances towards a 17 yr old female who was staying the night at his apartment., which he shared with two other flatmates.
When she refused, he became violent, smashing things. He then dragged her from the bedroom she'd been sleeping in, to the lounge room. As she lay on the floor, he kicked and punched her, and then ordered his flatmate and another friend to sexually assault her, which thet did.
As the girl was forced to perform oral sex on the two men, Canan continued to kick and beat her with the butt of a knife.
In February 2006, the men were found guilty and were given seven and five-year jail terms. Canan went to trial later that year, but he blamed crystal meth for the crime. He pleaded guilty but said his violent actions were brought on by ice psychosis, and that because of the drug, he had no control over himself at the time.
Should people who are drug users, get lighter sentences?
If I chose to take drugs, does that mean I should abandon my individual responsibilities and be done with the consequences that that drug brought with it?