@mrmhead Said
Why do you keep repeating this?
Nobody is claiming a fraudulent election - either 2016, or 2020.
Just because he got fewer votes, just because Russia influenced the minds of the gullible, doesn't make it a fraudulent election.
I agree with that last statement. It also didn't work to influence the vote, Trump lost by 3 million votes. If he had won the popular vote then we could say Russian influence had an affect.
There were claims of a fraudulent election in 2000 and in 2004. In 2016 there
were some claims but they got breezed over; even though Trump lost by 3 million votes but by some miracle won the electoral college.
Rigging an election and making the results seem super close that just happened to favor George Bush Jr is much more believable. Rigging them when the popular vote was so different isn't. It was done to be obvious and so people would blame "
The Government ."
The press spent the next four years saying the discrepancy was because of Russian efforts on Facebook. Congress even got committees together to grill Zuckerberg over the issue. No one is saying it was rigged?
Now the Q types, mislead souls, are saying Trump won in 2020. It's obvious from the 7 million vote deficit this is not the case. The "Big Lie" is an effort to take focus off the 2016 elections. They doth protest too much.
Here's something to chew on. It is possible Sanders the socialist or Bootiegieg the gay man may have lost against Trump. But, generally speaking, whoever won the DNC nomination was going to win. Even Creepy Joe was going to beat "grab em by the crotch" Donald T. The way to rig the 2020 election would be to rig the results in the DNC. Difficult to prove and probably not true anyway.